Found this video on BC Daily Buzz, and am assuming that since it's got embed links, it's OK to reproduce. This was shot by Mario Bartel of the Burnaby Newsleader a couple of days ago. It's me at the pond near Edmonds Skytrain Station where the deadly spill was first noticed on March 4, 2010.
The strength and duration of media interest in the recent fish kill in southeast Burnaby's Byrne Creek after someone illegally disposed of a chemical, likely down a drain on a street, is intriguing. The kill happened late Thursday afternoon, yet I was still receiving multiple calls for interviews and tours on Monday. Usually three- to four-day old local news is as appetizing to mainstream media as, er, rotting fish, but somehow this story had legs.
And we didn't send out a single press release or email, we didn't make a single phone call - we simply tried to keep up with the requests that poured in. We have no staff, streamkeepers are 100% volunteer. If anyone still doubts the power of Twitter, well, that's how this story started. . .
Perhaps it had something to do with public outrage. This story struck a chord. The creek is in an urban area, it is surrounded by public parks, and I think people are really getting the message that it's not only fish, it's about the entire ecosystem and our health, too.
I've been monitoring the online versions of stories, and people have been responding with anger and disbelief that such a tragedy could happen - yet again - in a beloved creek. People have also been scathingly skeptical that anything will really be done by the federal agencies that supposedly are tasked with protecting our environment and our health.
The outrage is palpable, and I think that's what has kept this story alive.
Streamkeepers are making lemonade from the lemons handed to us by the thoughtless polluter - we've been getting calls from concerned citizens reporting suspicious substances on streets and in ditches, we may have a few new faces at our monthly meeting tomorrow (Thursday, March 11, at 7:30pm - coordinates here), we've been getting requests from businesses to come speak to employees about the watershed and how we all connect to it.
I hope interest remains high, but I understand that we have to get on with our busy lives and attention will quickly fade. Unfortunately, I've seen this cycle several times on battered Byrne Creek, and I hope that my sense that this time the response is noticeably stronger isn't just wishful thinking.
Thank you to all the media who covered the kill! And thank you to the public for expressing your feelings. If you really want change to happen, if you want to see enforcement, I urge you to write your local MLAs and MPs, and the federal and provincial environment ministers - without strong policy direction agency staff's hands are tied.
Some of the media coverage of the toxic spill in SE Burnaby's Byrne Creek a few days ago:
The press is already getting results - a gentleman phoned me today with a report about seeing Powerhouse Creek, a tributary of Byrne Creek, running very dirty in the area of Beresford St. about a week ago. The more eyes we have on our local creeks, the better!
Update March 8, 2010
Update March 10, 2010
Burnaby Now on lack of enforcement
Burnaby Now on Mayor, City Council Push for Education
Update March 11, 2010
Sometimes it takes death to reveal how much life there is.
Would you believe that on average there was a dead fish less than every 2 meters along a sampled section of Byrne Creek the morning after someone poured a toxin down a street drain in the upper watershed on March 4, 2010? Most people never see fish in the creek - it takes patience, stealth, and knowing where to look to spot them when they are alive. My wife and I counted 231 dead trout, coho smolts (yearlings) and coho fry (this spring's babies) in an approximately 400-meter section of the creek. For those interested, here's the breakdown:
182 - Small cutthroat trout (say less than 15cm)
20 - Medium cutthroat trout (say 15-20cm)
1 - Large cutthroat trout (over 20cm)
Total 203 cutthroat trout
16 small-to-medium dead fish visible inside the culvert, too dark to ID
1 - large trout, very dark, no cutthroat markings on chin, near footbridge
8 - Coho smolts
3 - Coho fry
Total 11 coho salmon
Grand total dead fish in that stretch: 231
And that's likely lower than the actual number due to several factors: dead fish get wedged under rocks and drop deep in pools, the tiny fry are difficult to spot at all and we know that before the kill there were schools of dozens in the area sampled. In addition, opportunistic predation starts almost immediately after the toxin is quickly flushed down the creek: we found several fish partially eaten, and only strings of guts and bits of flesh too small to ID here and there.
The coho were found around T518 to T516 (lower end of the lower ravine). The coho fry were found in the vicinity of T517 where we photographed live ones a few days ago... See the entry below "Video of 2010 Salmon Fry in Byrne Creek."
The above photo shows dead fish ranging from coho fry at the bottom left,
a coho smolt a the bottom right, and an adult trout above. There was a
surprise to come, as you'll see in the next photo. . .
The big trout had a fry in its mouth. It's not hard to imagine what
happened - it spotted a little fish in distress from the chemical,
thought it an easy meal, and then before it could even finish
swallowing its target, the bigger fish also died.
Imagine walking down a street, and every few steps that you take, you come across a body.
A few more steps, a cluster of bodies. Every step, another body. Another group of bodies.
You approach an area where yesterday you saw small children playing - and you find small, inert bodies.
Small bodies, ranging from babies recently born, to midsize ones -- kids going to school. Further on, large ones, adults.
All with bulging eyes, gaping mouths.
Staring. At nothing. For they do not see any more. They do not breathe any more, for they died gasping for breath.
They choked to death.
That's what it was like today, carefully walking down Byrne Creek, counting the dead.
The dead that died when someone unthinkingly, uncaringly, or, despite decades of educational efforts, perhaps unknowingly, poured a chemical down a storm drain.
The bodies were fish. Just fish.
But we'll drink what went in that water someday, too. Or perhaps swim in it. Those toxins don't just disappear.
If we eat fish or other seafood, we will eat what went in that water someday, too.
All drains lead to fish habitat.
People habitat.
Every living thing's habitat.
I fear I'll dream tonight about counting the dead.
The bulging eyes, the gaping mouths.
The horrifying, constricting feeling of being unable to breathe.
We found fish today that in desperation had thrown themselves into the air, up onto the banks of the creek - to breathe, please let me breathe!
That would be like me throwing myself under water to escape foul, poisoned air - to breathe, please let me breathe!
Yes, I'm emotionally attached, because for days recently I eagerly patrolled Byrne Creek, looking for baby coho salmon, baby chum salmon, hoping against hope that the few salmon spawners that made it back last autumn succeeded in creating a new generation.
I saw baby fry, and I rejoiced. My heart soared. I took photos. I took videos.
I blogged, I Tweeted, I Facebooked. I did all that social media, cyberspace stuff.
But real life intervened
And now they are all dead.
And all that I can do is
Count the dead.
A chemical entered Byrne Creek in southeast Burnaby in the mid-to-late afternoon today, killing fish. Someone called Environment Canada [CORRECT: in fact the City of Burnaby received the call from the BC provincial enviro ministry after a youth called the Provincial Emergency Program], who then called the City, and streamkeepers also noticed the kill around the same time. City staff took samples and worked on tracing the source, which likely came from a storm drain, while streamkeepers took photos for documentation and sampled pH in the creek at several points. Both City staff and streamkeepers plan to follow up tomorrow. Here are some photos:
The fish ladder at the pond west of Griffiths Dr.
Water is covered with foam and slick to the touch.
There was an ammonia smell coming out of the pipe.
Dead fish on bottom of pool.
Dead cutthroat with hazy water visible. That's a size 12 boot
toe beside it for comparison.
Just a few days ago, streamkeepers were excited to see baby salmon
fry popping out of the gravel. We are concerned that they may also have
been affected.
I find it hard to believe that after decades of education efforts, such
kills still happen.
Please, folks, remember that all drains on roads and parking lots lead to fish habitat!
Ran across this study today (pdf doc): Re-Inventing Rainwater Management: A Strategy to Protect Health and Restore Nature in the Capital Region by the Environmental Law Centre at the University of Victoria. While I have yet to read all of it, it appears to be an excellent take on issues that streamkeepers in Burnaby and all over BC have been concerned about for years. An excerpt from the introduction to the problem:
We don't normally think of rainfall as pollution. However, over the last 150 years we have built cities in a way that transforms rainwater into an agent of considerable environmental harm: urban stormwater runoff.
Changing pristine rainwater into pollution occurs in stages. The first step is the creation of pollutants from driving and fixing cars, using chemicals on houses and yards, and commercial and industrial processes. Heavy metals, PCBs, oils, grease, antifreeze, solvents, pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, paint chips, PAHs, road salt, and detergents fall to the ground across the urban landscape.
The second step involves our construction of impervious surfaces such as roofs, paved streets, sidewalks, and parking lots. As a city develops, the vegetation and natural soils that absorb and filter rainwater are replaced by impervious surfaces. When we pave over nature's absorption and filtration system, the next heavy rain sweeps across the landscape's hard surfaces picking up pollutants.
In the final step, the storm sewer system rapidly conveys all this polluted water to the nearest water body and flushes it at high speed into a sensitive aquatic ecosystem. In addition to the pollutants from the landscape, the water often contains paint and motor oil that people have dumped into the storm sewer. To make things worse, in older municipalities, this stormwater often contains sanitary sewage.
From our friends at LEPS, via the PSKF message board:
Make your neighbourhood a better place and start something healthier for you and for salmon, in your backyard!
On Saturday March 13, join Langley Environmental Partners Society from 10am-3pm at the Fraser River Presentation Theatre, 4th floor, 20338- 65 Ave Langley, for the 3rd annual Salmon Friendly Gardens Seminar.
This workshop style seminar will have speakers present practical solutions for:
Event includes refreshment break. Pre-registration is required, to register email kgreenwood@tol.ca
Why grow a salmon-friendly garden?
Every Langley home is located in the middle of salmon habitat. Each of Langley's twelve watersheds collects runoff from our backyards and directs it into one of our salmon-bearing streams. The Fraser River salmon run - the largest in Canada - depends on these small tributaries for spawning and the healthy development of young fish.
The upshot is that what we put on our gardens ends up in our streams, including pesticides and fertilizers. In addition, the majority of Langley's tap water comes from aquifers, meaning that our drinking water originates directly below our feet. When you consider that 95% of pesticides used on residential yards are considered probable or possible carcinogens by the US Environmental Protection Agency, there's good reason to cut back on the chemicals we use in our gardens.
This worrying evidence doesn't mean that your garden has to go to the bugs. LEPS presents this full-day seminar on how to grow a beautiful, healthy and productive garden without chemicals.
The event also launches the Township of Langley's pilot Grow Healthy ~ Grow Smart Program.
Salmon Saturdays are supported by the Fraser Salmon and Watersheds Program.
Join Burnaby Food First for a community forum on the future of food in Burnaby. Local community groups will showcase their successful projects, participants will discuss food issues in Burnaby, and plan for a resilient local food system. A healthy lunch will be provided.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
8:30 - 1:30 Shadbolt Centre
6450 Deer Lake Ave., Burnaby
Everyone is welcome. Please register by March 26 via email:
The Burnaby Board of Trade's inaugural Environmental Sustainability Forum for Business last night was a big success, with a stimulating panel of speakers who provided inspiration and examples to help companies get on the road toward reducing their environmental footprints while boosting their bottom lines.
Held at the magnificent Electronic Arts campus in Burnaby, the panel featured Peter Robinson, CEO of the David Suzuki Foundation; TJ Galda, chair of the Electronic Arts Green Team; David Moran, Director of Public Affairs and Communications for Coca-Cola Canada; and Maureen Cureton, Green Business Manager, Vancity. The speakers and ensuing Q & A were ably coordinated by facilitator Coro Strandberg, principal of Strandberg Consulting and author of the Small and Medium-Sized Business Environmental Roadmap for Industry Canada.
The event appeared to be sold out. The auditorium was packed, and the speakers were well received by a responsive and appreciative audience. The panel was a good mix in terms of age and experience, and represented senior corporate management, staff, and NGOs. The overall message was that the green-blue wave is well underway, and companies of all sizes must understand environmental sustainability, and implement it, to hire and retain excellent staff, and develop and maintain optimal relations with their supply chains and customers.
Advice? While you have to have commitment and support from upper management, imbuing an organization with the values of environmental sustainability requires that everyone gets on board. Simply setting up a sustainability team or section will not change behaviour - it will alleviate personal responsibility as staff think "I don't have to do anything, that other group will take care of things."
An interesting resource that was mentioned was the David Suzuki Ambassadors program that provides workshops for businesses "interested in greening their practices." That was another theme that was repeated by several speakers - there are plenty of NGOs out there that businesses can partner with to work together on environmental goals.
A call for volunteers appeared in the local papers to help clean out bird boxes at Burnaby Lake Regional Park for the spring nesting season, so Yumi and I drove over this Saturday morning to check out what the Burnaby Lake Park Association was up to.
Led by the irrepressibly passionate and knowledgeable Joe Sadowski, the 30-40 folks who showed up were divided into three or four teams and spread out to do some housecleaning. Despite the overcast, drizzly conditions, people's spirits ran high.
And a lovely Wood Duck couple, perhaps looking to move
in to the newly cleaned housing :-)
As a member of the Burnaby Board of Trade Environmental Sustainability Committee, I have been asked to forward this invitation to people in my business network.
-----------------
January 21, 2010
On behalf of the Burnaby Board of Trade, I would like to personally invite you to attend the BBOT's inaugural Environmental Sustainability Forum for Business on Wednesday, February 3, 2010. This event will showcase a distinguished panel of speakers who will discuss strategies for reducing your environmental footprint and the economic benefits of sustainability.
The objective of this forum is to create an open dialogue within the local business community to explore the business case of going green. The panel includes:
Facilitator: Coro Strandberg, Principal of Strandberg Consulting and author of the Small and Medium-Sized Business Environmental Roadmap for Industry Canada
Event Details
Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010
5:30 pm Registration
6:30 pm Panel Presentation
Electronic Arts Canada, Ltd.
4334 Sanderson Way, Burnaby BC
$30.00 + GST
To register, please RSVP to 604.412.0100 or email admin@bbot.ca by Friday, January 29, 2010.
Several years ago, Byrne Creek Streamkeepers marked rain drains (aka storm drains) around Edmonds Skytrain Station (among other areas) in southeast Burnaby with yellow fish to remind the public that nothing other than rain should go down these drains because they lead directly to fish habitat.
The other day I met my wife at the station and took some shots of an apparent, ahem, pissing match. Excuse my language, but it really reminds me of territorial scent marking by canines and other beasties :-).
You can clearly see the cute original fish painted over by, to my eye, the rather blimp-like, mean-looking latecomer. From Translink? Why mark already marked drains?
A sobering article in the Washington Post. While many countries have come together to clean up and revitalize the Danube, there has been little progress on the environmental devastation to Ukraine's Dnieper perpetrated under the communist regime.
In response to a series of negative posts regarding on-demand water heaters on a mailing list:
While we have a gas-fired tank hot-water heater in our townhouse, I'm a bit surprised at the number of negative anecdotes regarding on-demand heaters.
As mentioned, they have been in widespread use for decades in Asia and Europe. I had several apartments in Japan with on-demand heaters and never experienced running short of hot water, or being subjected to spurts of cold water. And no matter what the outside temperature, it never seemed to take more than 10-20 seconds to get a steady flow of piping hot water -- certainly not any longer than it takes now for us to get hot water in the upstairs shower from the tank heater in the basement.
My wife's parents' place is in northern Japan, and it gets bloody cold up there for 4+ months each year, yet the suitcase-sized on-demand water heater in their house has never exhibited any such negative behaviour in 20 or more years of use.
If I may be so bold, I'd also venture that Japanese are among the greatest lovers of hot water in the world, and most have a tolerance, nay, an affinity, for soaking in water so hot that simply dipping a foot in it makes me want to scream :-).
Many Japanese shower/baths have faucets with a colour-gradated blue-red dial, accompanied by degree C markings. The top end of the red zone abuts a safety interlock button, which one can depress to be able to turn the faucet even further.
I wonder if some of this can be chalked up to a lack of experience in NA? I admit that when our hot-water heater died several years ago, we replaced it with another tank heater, but that was mostly due to the limited availability and greater initial expense of on-demand heaters here, combined with seemingly little knowledge or experience with them in local stores and among local plumbers.
Thanks to Watershed Watch for putting on a forum yesterday "to discuss how NGOs can work together to move the Living Water Smart (LWS) agenda forward, and how groups can help to modernize the BC Water Act." I enjoyed the presentations, learned a lot, and was impressed with the knowledge represented by the people in the room.
The organizers are asking for input so here goes: I'm not sure if "getting groundwater in" came up much in discussion, and that's crucial, particularly in urban watersheds like the creek that I volunteer on as a streamkeeper. The focus seemed to be on sucking groundwater out, which of course is very important, but we shouldn't neglect the "letting it soak in naturally" part of the cycle.
I'm not sure if a water act can include things like impermeable vs permeable surfaces, swales, rain gardens, infiltration ponds, biofiltration, street-edge alternatives, etc., but rainwater infiltration > groundwater infiltration is crucial in urban watersheds. Otherwise too much water is dumped into creeks through rain drains (trying to reshape the debate by getting away from "storm drains") during moderate-to-heavy rains, and not enough gets into the ground to maintain base flows in long, hot, dry spells.
I know we don't want to get too detailed or prescriptive, so perhaps as part of the preamble, or guiding principles, there could be something about the permeability-groundwater issue in regard to promoting watershed-friendly development and redevelopment guidelines?
From the The Yomiuri Shimbun
This article is about salmon returning to the Chikumagawa river as flows improved after East Japan Railway Co. was directed to stop taking illegal amounts of water from the river to power trains in Tokyo.
Wow, amazing how one's life can change. When I rode the Yamanote Line in Tokyo on a daily or weekly basis for well over ten years from 1985 - 1999 I had no idea that some of the power was coming from a dam that was impacting salmon. Mind you I knew next to nothing about salmon, and nothing about streamkeeping back then.
I attended a Metro Vancouver luncheon on solid waste management on behalf of the Burnaby Board of Trade Environmental Sustainability Committee.
Here's my distillation of the presentation materials and the ensuing discussion:
Top priority is to reduce, reuse, recycle.
Now diverting 55% of waste.
Goal is to divert 70% of waste by 2015 (Metro Toronto has set this goal for year 2010 and is nowhere near achieving it).
MetroVan population projected to grow from ~2 million to ~3 million, so increasing diversion from 55% to 70% has little effect on remaining solid waste.
Even with a 70% diversion rate there will still be over 1 million tonnes of solid waste to dispose of every year.
Three scenarios:
1) waste-to-energy (incinerate)
2) landfill mechanically/biologically treated waste
3) landfill
Key point: When it comes to overall emissions, solid waste management contributes 1% or less in the Fraser Valley, under any scenario.
MetroVan says studies show no discernible health impacts from WTE (waste-to-energy) plants. Many EU nations have WTE plants located in major cities. EU no longer allows landfills.
Key point: What about the "fourth R" in addition to reduce, reuse, recycle? REVENUE (or cost).
WTE, because of heat and electricity generation, has a 35-year NET REVENUE of $20 million in the MetroVan scenarios. The other two options COST between $1.5 billion to $1.8 billion over 35 years.
MetroVan is strongly promoting WTE as the solution.
What about 100% diversion? It becomes uneconomical at a certain point - diminishing returns.
MetroVan feels it's not winning the PR/media war on WTE. Needs to present clear, understandable message to the public. In greater Vancouver, 60% in favor of WTE, but in Fraser Valley only 37%.
I used to question WTE, but I've come around for several reasons. I don't see 100% diversion as being achievable, I think the emissions/health impact from running diesel trucks up the valley to a landfill would be far more detrimental than a new WTE facility, and finally WTE is the only alternative (at least according to MetroVan's consultants) that makes economic sense. In fact it makes $ from producing electricity and heat, whereas the other options cost billions of dollars.
My other observation is that few people even seem to be aware of the WTE facility that has been operating in my home town of Burnaby for years. I'd say 80% of the people that I talk to don't even know it's there.
Being a good, green citizen, I took the SkyTrain to downtown Vancouver this morning to attend Book Camp Vancouver. When the doors of the train opened at Edmonds Station, a wave of hot, humid, fetid air washed over me on the platform, and I cringed as I stepped aboard.
Why the heck was the heat on? You do not need heat when you have people packed into an enclosed space. What a waste of energy! Has TransLink never heard of thermostats?
It must have been pushing 30C in the car as people stood packed shoulder to shoulder, the windows fogged over and rolling with condensation. It was a perfect incubator for the flu season. H1N1? I guess TransLink has never heard of it. Wouldn't it make more sense to have the heat off and external air circulation cranked to the max?
Moisture was soon rolling down my body too -- sweat. Sweat trickling down my back, and eventually even down my legs.
We all stood there suffering silently, station after station, like good sheep-like Canadians, until some brave soul finally cracked a window a couple of stops before the end of the line.
I'm a firm believer in the benefits of mass transit, but TransLink has to provide a better atmosphere for commuters. You're not going to get more people on the trains if they dread the ride.
I never thought I'd be quoting a publication called the Daily Commercial News and Construction Record, but I'm willing to learn from anyone. An article entitled Philly's bold stormwater management plan leads the way caught my eye - it's an initiative that I'd like to see in more cities, and promoted by ones like my own Burnaby.
I love the following quotation from the article:
The plan reimagines the city as an oasis of rain gardens, green roofs, permeable pavements, thousands of additional trees, and more. The idea is to turn the city into a giant sponge to absorb as much rainwater as possible and delay the rest in its journey to the nearby Delaware and Schuykill rivers.
Now that's vision! Or simply going back to what used to be . . . Most cities were once giant sponges, because that's what most land used to be before we built on it. So it makes sense to return to what worked for Mother Nature for millennia, eh?
How about this?
The new plan announced last month would "peel back" a lot of the city's concrete and asphalt and replace them with plants - rain gardens, green roofs, landscaped swales in parking lots, heavily planted boulevards, and small wetlands.
Yes! Streamkeepers and other concerned citizens have dreamed of this for years. The main issues dogging urban creeks are massive flows during rains because of all the water that goes shooting off of roads, roofs and parking lots straight into street drains, and pollution from oil, antifreeze, brake-lining dust, rubber, soap, other chemicals, etc., washing off our streets. Rain gardens, ponds, swales - they would all help with both problems, slowing peak flows and filtering out pollutants.
I believe all municipalities in British Columbia are required to produce ISMPs (integrated stormwater management plans) for all of their watersheds, and Burnaby is no exception. The City has been working on a Byrne Creek ISMP for some time now, and I have sat in on stakeholder sessions as a representative from the Byrne Creek Streamkeepers.
Unfortunately, I haven't witnessed much imagination in the process so far. I get the sense that there's more talk about more pipes, than there is about rain gardens, swales, street-edge alternatives, trees and plants. More pipes? That's so 19th and early-to-mid 20th century, eh? Let's be forward-looking!
Groan, I just got another pack of sample Xmas Cards in the mail today from an "environmental" group. Thank you for using up all that paper, coating it, printing it, spewing diesel fumes to truck it from place to place, just so that it could go into my recycle bin to be trucked, processed. . .
Enough with the address labels, the preprinted "From the Desk of Paul Cipywnyk" notepads, the Xmas Cards. I have an overflowing drawer full of them. I have enough address labels to keep me going for several lifetimes.
How many letters do I send these days anyway? How many do you send? All my bills are on scheduled auto-withdrawal/auto-charge programs, and I email, IM, Facebook, Tweet, or Skype family and friends.
I refuse to donate to groups that use this sort of marketing, and if you got my name and address from a previous donation, you will lose me as a supporter if you follow up with any of the above products.
Thanks to Julie Maclellan who mentioned me in her Burnaby Now column this weekend. She called me a "streamkeeper, environmental advocate and blogger about all sorts of interesting things." The pressure is on now!
Well-done :-) video on buying, eating local. Do you know where your food comes from? Sobering statistics on how much food we import, and how far it travels.
Hellmann's - It's Time for Real from CRUSH on Vimeo.
Is there any possibility of daylighting any of Vancouver's 60-odd lost and buried creeks as part of the mayor's plan to make Vancouver the world's greenest city?
How about a truly green city with salmon spawning in dozens of creeks running through neighbourhoods everywhere? That's what we used to have....
http://vancouver.ca/greenestcity/
Byrne Creek Streamkeepers will have our booth set up from noon to 4:00 p.m. at Choices in the Park for their Earth Day BBQ. We will also offer tours of Byrne Creek, so come and sign up! This is in southeast Burnaby, near Edmonds Skytrain Station. Last year's event was great fun, and kudos to Choices for sponsoring and collecting donations for streamkeepers' efforts to preserve and enhance this lovely, but struggling, urban creek.
One month to go to the Edmonds Community Clean Sweep on Saturday, May 2, 2009, sponsored by the Edmonds Business & Community Association.
Mark your calendars, Burnabarians!
Meet at the Eastburn Community Centre to register at 9:45 am, or alternate registration available with the Byrne Creek Streamkeepers at the Edmonds Skytrain station parking lot.

Thanks to Rosewood Printers for the great poster!
UBC sustainability experts say that for the $3.1 billion cost of a new Port Mann bridge "the government could finance a 200-kilometre light rail network that would place a modern, European-style tram within a 10-minute walk for 80 per cent of all residents in Surrey, White Rock, Langley and the Scott Road district of Delta, while providing a rail connection from Surrey to the new Evergreen line and connecting Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge into the regional rail system."
Read the full article.
Seems like a no-brainer, eh?
"According to a UN estimate, golf courses around the world use 2.5 billion gallons of water each day—if potable, that would handle the needs of 4.7 billion people."
That's a scary statistic. Why not use recycled sewage as this article suggests?
I've been following the Depave website because these folks are doing fantastic work. It would be great if we could get some similar projects going here in the City of Burnaby, and across Metro Vancouver and the lower mainland.
Depave's mission is "to inspire and promote the removal of unnecessary concrete and asphalt from urban areas" with the vision of "Livable cities where people and wildlife coexist and thrive amidst clean air, clean water, and an abundance of plants, trees, and vegetation."
Here's an update on the type of stuff they're doing:
-------------------------------
Depaving Opportunity!
On Saturday, March 21st, we will be partnering with the Mt. Scott Learning Center to depave part of their parking lot at MSLC! They are hoping to turn it into a green space for students and community members, and need volunteers to help with the depaving. They are looking for 40-50 volunteers. I know there are Depavers out there ready to bust up some cement, so here is your chance! The information is as follows:
* Date: Saturday, March 21
* Time: 10 am - 4 pm
* Location: MSLC High School at Laurelwood Church (6148 SE Holgate Blvd. in Portland)
* Requirements: Event will go on rain or shine so come prepared for the appropriate weather. Tools, gloves, safety gear, drinks and lunch will be provided.
-------------------------------
And another project they've been working on:
Fargo Garden Update
Fargo Garden is the site on N. Williams and NE Fargo, where we did our large depaving event in June of 2008. The site is approximately 3,000 square feet. The project was funded through a grant from the (City of Portland) Bureau of Environmental Services, and includes transforming the now-depaved lot into a 'food forest' and community gathering space.
After many months of work, we submitted our 'Site Development Plan,' including stormwater management features, to the Portland Bureau of Development Services (BDS) on March 2nd. We hope to receive our permit by the end of this week (by 3/20) and then to spring into action with the rest of our work. What does that entail? Removing the remaining gravel from the site, creating paths and bioswales, adding lots of organic material, finishing the fence and gates... and planting! And celebrating!
--------------------------------
This sounds so cool!
For years we've talked about composting, but we always shied away because we live in a townhouse with no garden. Today at the BC Boat & Sportsmen's Show I finally decided to go for a Worm Factory composter that supposedly can be used indoors with no-to-minimal odor if you've got it running right.
I bought a 3-tray kit with worms from Webster Solar Energy and brought them home from the show. After supper, Yumi and I read the instruction book and set up the system, getting our first "working tray" going. Here's hoping things go well and that as the worms get at it, and we keep adding trays, in a couple of months we'll be ready to start using rich, homemade compost in our indoor and balcony plants.

Me opening up a can, er, box, of worms.

Yumi pointing out worms. Cool!

Closeup of worms.

Choco the cat is not too sure about this...
Passionate speech by Sylvia Earle on saving the ocean -- a prize-winner at the TED conference.
"We are facing paradise lost."
"We have taken over 90% of the big fish from the sea."
"Health for oceans means health for us."
"I hope that some day that we will find evidence that there is intelligent life among humans on this planet."
"Auden: Thousands have lived without love. None have lived without water."
"With every drop of water you drink, every breath you take, you are connected to the sea no matter where on earth you live."
"No water, no life. No blue, no green."
"(CNN) -- Climate-driven environmental changes could drastically affect the distribution of more than 1,000 species of commercial fish and shellfish around the world, scientists say."
This echoes some of the discussion at the recent State of the Salmon 2009 conference that I attended. Could the day come when the Fraser, the world's greatest salmon river, could no longer support runs?
Thanks to @timoreilly on Twitter for this lead: "A great New Yorker piece about Van Jones and Green for All: http://twurl.nl/id0ti6. This guy has it all: message, presence, vision."
The article is called "Greening the Ghetto" and is a must-read for those who care about all levels of society, who are worried about the economic crisis we are in, and who may be placing environmental issues on the back burner.
Green for All The goal is to get the greenest solutions to the poorest people.
I loved this quotation: “I’m not looking for the points of difference. I’m looking for the points of commonality. I’ve trained my mind so that people can say twenty-seven things that might be objectionable, but as soon as they say one, that twenty-eighth thing, that’s in the right direction, that’s where I’m going to go in the conversation."
I want to check out the book The Green Collar Economy.
One of the interesting ideas that came out of the State of the Salmon 2009 conference was "Adopt a Legislator". Unfortunately, I don't recall which speaker said it, so I can't give it proper attribution.
Anyway, delegates from several countries agreed that the only way to get change going, and action happening, was to educate politicians.
So here you go, some protocol and forms of address when writing to politicians in Canada, at various levels of govt., from the CivicNet BC website (thanks to editor Shaun Oakey for pointing this out):
or
http://www.civicnet.bc.ca/siteengine/activepage.asp?PageID=250
The State of the Salmon 2009 conference over the last three-and-a-half days has left me stunned -- long days and lots of information to process. I documented it as best I could in a running collection of Tweets on my Twitter account, and I've posted that entire flow of jottings to my blog here.
First let me say that the conference organizers did a tremendous job. I don't know if there was ever any panic behind the curtains, but there was nary a glitch to be seen by the audience. And thanks to the simultaneous interpreters who mediated the flow in English, Russian and Japanese.
This was the second State of the Salmon conference, and my first. It's mostly aimed at scientists and bureaucrats, but we had a pretty good volunteer presence from lower-mainland streamkeepers and First Nations from the west coast and north. I think such broad representation greatly added to the conference, but of course I'm biased :-).
One of the threads that flowed throughout was the need for more research on how to protect and conserve wild salmon, and there was excitement about the new approach to science under the new Obama administration. The research dollars may start flowing again!
It was interesting to see the rifts occasionally bubble to the surface between the geneticists, the hatchery promoters and hatchery critics, the "stronghold, or protect the best" advocates and those who feel all habitat deserves protection. As a streamkeeper working on the ground, I was part of perhaps a minority that felt that any available $$ need to go toward action and habitat protection. We know what the problems are, yet we continue to study the patient while he's dying. Any knowledge we gain in the end is still, as one participant put it, "looking at a construction site through a hole in a fence -- and we're standing ten feet back from the hole."
There was also an underlying sense that perhaps with climate change leading to ocean warming and acidification, there is no way to prevent the loss of southern salmon spawning areas. Which to my mind made the groaning buffet tables laden day after day with salmon, halibut, shrimp, pork, bison, chicken etc. seem an indictment of the principles of having such a conference in the first place. Of course I ate everything, so I'm as guilty as anyone, but it never ceases to amaze me at how difficult it is for us humans to make our actions even approximate our pious thoughts. When it comes to human gatherings, feasting is so ingrained in all cultures that I doubt we'll ever get away from such behaviour.
At one point I was dreaming about future historians studying the progression of conferences and seeing that at the first one participants ate crab and lobster, at the second salmon and shrimp, at the third tofu and beans... and finally they were chewing on switchgrass because that was all that was left :-). Oh, rats, I've trapped myself in an illogical story -- by that point there would be, er, no point, in holding another salmon conference. I digress...
Something that was strangely absent from any discussion was pollution. I think it came up once in passing in a comment from the audience, and perhaps was glossed over by one of the speakers. Yet pollution is one of the biggest issues when it comes to habitat preservation, and is a direct and deadly killer of urban streams. And what's it doing to ocean survivability? We humans have been flushing all sorts of chemicals down our rivers and into the ocean for centuries -- surely that must have some impact on the "mystery" of declining biodiversity. Yet it was never addressed.
It was refreshing to hear from First Nations representatives who spoke from the heart, and who gave a breath of life to the proceedings. You can throw up all the PowerPoint slides full of as many charts and plots, and dense statistical calculations, as you like, but to hear the simple words "We have no fish anymore," provides much greater clarity and grounding.
Well, I have to get back to work, and perhaps I'll find time for more analysis and synthesis later.
I'm glad I attended.
Now, how about some ACTION!
Here are my Tweets from today's State of the Salmon 2009 conference sessions (third of three days), in last-to-first order:
Angelo: we all hope that future generations will be able to admire salmon as we have.
Angelo: we cannot forget the hope that salmon themselves represent.
Angelo: sustainability must be a primary guide.
Angelo: We need more political leadership.
Angelo: I worry about a younger generation that is drifting away from.
Angelo: need to do more to reconnect young people to the environment.
Angelo: Protecting salmon needs to be seen as a moral issue.
Angelo: need a precautionary approach to development.
Angelo: the unrelenting loss of salmon habitat is mainly due to rising human population.
Angelo: Heart of the Fraser is one of most productive stretches of river in the world.
Angelo: pollution, water extraction, development.
Angelo: but we also have to protect rivers that are still in good shape.
Angelo: urban habitat restoration leads to education.
Angelo: Protect, reconnect, restore.
Angelo: We need to better identify and manage key salmon watersheds.
Angelo: Need to incorporate local values so that people buy in.
Angelo: Instead of reacting to bad development planning, need to be proactive.
Angelo: Need to put a more preventive slant on habitat preservation.
Angelo: need to better understand and incorporate societal values into conservation.
Angelo: strive to develop ecosystem-based approaches to conservation.
Angelo: there is a need for new and fresh approaches.
Angelo: there is a pressing need for action.
Angelo: Most important is to move from discussion to being more action oriented.
Angelo: the theme for this conference was "Bringing the Future into Focus".
Angelo: Closing remarks.
Our problem is managing people, not fish.
Protected areas give society an excuse to ignore everything else.
Comment -- urban streams are so important, they bring fish to people's backyards.
Belyaev -- every citizen of every country is an integral part of the environment, their habitat.
Belyaev -- legislators won't get on side until they are informed.
Need to have an ongoing conversation with a legislator.
"Adopt a Legislator" Every scientist, every activist needs to adopt a legislator.
We're still talking about the same things we were 15 years ago -- how do get moving, doing?
We need a scale that people can relate to.
We need to change the paradigm as how we function as humans.
We need an informed public that votes differently and changes behavior.
Glaciers "make rivers work" in many places.
How long will glacier-fed watersheds continue to exist?
Groundwater flows are critical to spawning habitat and must be protected.
QA "we'll come to that later" -- later is now.
Every salmon stream must have a protected base flow throughout the seasons.
Alaska has strong laws for preserving flows in streams for salmon, but tough process.
Bristol: salmon are fun, they're food, let people define salmon for themselves.
Bristol: need to do outreach with political decision makers, and those who live off salmon.
Bristol: reframe the issue -- protected areas to pass on to future generations.
Bristol: Tongas has been a long and heated land battle in Alaska, but we're making progress.
Bristol: Grassroots concept -- bringing more and disparate people to conservation.
Bristol: what role do salmon play in modern society?
Bristol: Trout Unlimited Alaska
Belyaev: we can't accomplish anything in isolation, need all groups aboard.
Belyaev: criticizing is a favourite pastime of people.
Belyaev: different fishermen have very different opinions.
Belyaev: where can we find a compromise among all the groups?
Belyaev: salmon preservation is first and foremost human relations, scientists, fisherman, politicians.
Belyaev: How is Russia different -- no private property along rivers, so feds can protect areas.
Healey: must be thinking about salmon within context of global change.
Healey: the future is not going to be same as the past.
Healey: should we preserve Arctic areas as refuge for migrating salmon?
Healey: we have to start looking at Arctic as becoming suitable for salmon.
Healey: are there places where salmon habitat will continue to be suitable in face of warming.
Healey: In a very few decades most salmon habitat in southern range will no longer be suitable for them.
Healey: we really need to take a long-term view of conservation.
Kopchak: we are building an "electronic elder" to collate/share information.
Kopchak: Find common languages, cross jurisdictional systems.
Kopchak: H2O -- Headwaters to Ocean.
What are you going to do about long-term sustainability of salmon. YOU.
We who love salmon are not necessarily representative of the general public.
Rahr: we cannot succeed without preserving salmon strongholds.
Rahr: Russian far east has best opportunity for salmon habitat preservation.
Rahr: WWF study says 55,000 tons of salmon are poached for roe yearly in Kamchatka.
Rahr: We tend to react at the 11th hour -- we need to take the long view, get ahead of the curve.
Rahr: We don't proactively protect, we react, so good places get pounded, it's a losing strategy.
Rahr: Pacific Salmon Conservation Assessment.
Rahr: The time to be effective is before the threat is on top of you.
Rahr: we must save the best -- habitat etc.
Rahr: Pacific Rim population will double by 2050.
Rarh -- Wild Salmon Center http://www.wildsalmoncenter.
Fukushima: masu salmon are effectively protected but taimen are not.
How the heck do get an average from some of these scatter plots?
Fukushima: Japanese huchen/taimen -- http://tinyurl.com/cfo4tw
Fukushima: fish species richness falls due to damming.
Fukushima: Hokkaido protected drainages designed for salmon conservation.
Fukushima: Hokkaido has 574 watersheds of which 32 are "protected drainages"
Fukushima: Japan has thousands of dams.
Fukushima: National Institute for Environmental Studies Tsukuba Japan http://www.nies.go.jp/
Marxan: http://www.uq.edu.au/marxan
Reeves: Marxan -- a decision support system for systematic conservation planning.
Reeves: Concept of irreplaceability -- areas essential to meet conservation goals.
Reeves: We have long thought that nature can bounce back from any indignity we impose upon it.
Reeves: Livingston Stone was calling for salmon reserves in Alaska in 1892.
Salmonid Rivers Observatory Network
Do we need more vision or more implementation?
Skeena: kids learn to honour, respect and take care of the fishery.
Skeena -- these fisheries are also nurturing grounds for our children.
Skeena -- this is all for naught if we don't protect the habitat. Yes!
In-river native fisheries don't need boats, fuel, port infrastructure.
Skeena, we can catch fish in better ways, with more local benefits, while boosting biodiversity.
Russia -- we need legislation like Canada's Wild Salmon Policy, and we need more than that.
Kaev: Pink salmon need improvement of spawning conditions.
Kaev: chum salmon need further development of hatchery rearing.
Kaev: wild vs hatchery salmon in Sakhalin.
Russains are using Google Earth for some mapping -- what a change from the Cold War!
Semenchenko: Sakhalin test rivers -- Taranay, Kura, Naycha.
Semenchenko: move away from monitoring commercial fisheries to whole river monitoring.
Semenchenko: Monitoring salmon in Sakhalin.
Tabunkov: We are talking major devastation (poachers + ruthless companies).
Tabunkov: Companies will take maximum fish regardless of regulations.
Tabunkov: Poachers taking about 20% of salmon caught.
Tabunkov: I don't want to keep this photo on screen (fish gutted for roe only) -- too depressing.
Tabunkov: Problem of poachers taking roe only.
Tabunkov: problem of "heavily corrupt companies working with "heavily corrupt bureaucrats"
Tabunkov: we do not tag hatchery fish on Sakhalin so research "leaves much to be desired"
Tabunkov: hatchery chum pushed wild pink out of spawning grounds, so law was changed.
Tabunkov: these recently built hatcheries were destructive to wild fish.
Tabunkov: fishing companies are building their own hatcheries with no scientific input.
Tabunkov: Sakhalin has 15 federal hatcheries producing 900 million fish?/year.
Tabunkov: Sakhalin divided into over 700 fishing areas -- assigned to companies -- they care for enviro.
Tabunkov: no forestry, no mining, no drilling equals recovering fish.
Tabunkov: collapsing Russian economy (see prev Tweet) resulted in recovery of salmon.
Tabunkov: collapsing Russian economy some years ago impacted fisheries - no forestry, mining, drilling.
Tabunkov: Sometimes there were too many spawning fish that clogged the river - I don't get this.
Tabunkov: Fisheries Association of Sakhalin http://tinyurl.com/cegdgd
Tabunkov: I'm here representing concerns of fishermen.
Taylor: thanks to First Nations of the Skeen Fisheries Commission http://www.skeenafisheries.ca/
Taylor: looking for "fair trade" designation for Skeena salmon sustainable harvested by FN.
Taylor: all economic benefits of Babine/Skeen fishery stays local.
Taylor: conservation, biodiversity and ecological integrity paramount in all decisions.
Taylor: develop selective in-river fisheries that emulate what FN did.
Taylor: look back to move forward -- there are other ways.
Taylor: but increased abundance of "enhanced Sockeye" has led to overharvest of wild fish.
Taylor: says installation of spawning channels was a success.
BTW, by FN, I refer to First Nations, or "native Indians".
Taylor: We are trying to replicate something FN had in place for hundreds of years.
Taylor: FN principles -- reciprocal economic exchange, strict and transparent enforcement of rules.
Taylor: FN principles -- fishing property rights, sustainability, conservation for future generations.
Taylor: Babine River, FN used to harvest 3/4 million salmon a year.
Taylor: First Nations "managed" fisheries for hundreds and thousands of years – sustainably.
Taylor: there was a robust fishery on the Skeens thousands of years ago - a sustainable FN fishery.
Taylor: Skeena Wild Conservation Trust - http://www.skeenawild.org/
So LuLu says, yes we need a TV show or weekly newspaper column called "Fish Files"
Artist LuLu has a panel on her scroll called "Fish Files" -- I like that, sounds like a TV series.
Artist Lu is chronicling the conf with an art scroll.
Morning break is announced -- we now get to eat Skeena salmon with our coffee.
I'm feeling like the patient is dying and we're discussing better ways to monitor the decline.
DFO asked Tlingit to halve salmon take, elders said no fishing at all because there are almost no fish.
Tlingit have completely stopped fishing in the headwaters of the Yukon on advice from elders.
Peterman: we have data on Fraser sockeye "all the way back to 1938" - how is that "historical"?
Canada's Species at Risk Act - http://tinyurl.com/cdg9s6 9:31 AM
QA comment, no fish species has ever been listed as endangered under SARA, even the cod that 99% gone.
Holt: We suggest that risk tolerance be identified by fisheries management.
Holt: uncertainties are pervasive, but we can account for them in the model... Uh, OK
Mortality is depensatory when its rate increases as the size of the population decreases. (http://tinyurl.com/ccwwws)
Holt: depensatory mortality -- another term I need to learn
Canada's Wild Salmon Policy: http://tinyurl.com/bexba
Holt: speaking on Canada's Wild Salmon Policy
Zhivotovsky: there are some lake-spawning chum salmon in Russia - rare
Zhivotovsky: speaking about research on "south Kuril" islands - wonder how Japanese feel about this?
Thinking at the first conf they ate crab and lobster, now salmon and shrimp, next conf tofu and beans.
Here are my Tweets from today's State of the Salmon 2009 conference sessions (second of three days), in last-to-first order:
BTW. today's sessions wrapped up with a plea from octogenarian Pearl Keenan -- nice to have some heart instead of statistics. She's from the Tlingit First Nation in the Yukon. Her basic plea? Please stop taking all the fish at the mouth of the river -- she lives near the headwaters, and they're all gone up there. I had to find her later and thank her for speaking from the heart, and hoping we would listen to something other than "science" and PowerPoints.
Long: Washington State fisheries are dependent on hatcheries
Busack: Argument is now how serious is domestication (hatchery fish), not if it exists.
Busack: Concern that interbreeding between hatchery and wild fish reduces fitness.
Researchers find what they look for, and when you bring up other potential factors, they get defensive.
When issues arise, it's time to break for coffee. Sheesh.
One word I have yet to hear at this conference is "pollution."
Q&A: Beamish -- coho and chinook in St of Gerogia are critical and think will get worse.
Walters: But culling seals is no solution because they also keep down other predators.
Walters: Huge growth in harbour seal population in Georgia Strait.
Walters: Ocean mortality causes hypotheses - hatchery disease, ocean warming, predators??
Walters: We don't know what is causing coho and chinook ocean mortality.
Walters: South BC chinook continue to decline despite closing commercial fishing in 80s and sport in 90s.
Walters: coho spawning in south BC has collapsed even with hatchery supplementation.
Walters: Declining marine survival is the biggest hit to salmon.
Walters: there has been no substantial habitat loss since 1990. Huh?
What data? Historic salmon runs - data never goes back more than a century, so how is that "historic"?
Walters: severe coho and chinook declines in south BC - threats are other than fishing.
Some speakers really need to take a Plain English course! Jargon-itis puts the audience to sleep.
What the heck is a "mortality objective"?
Schindler: geomorphic variation in fresh water is reflected in ocean growth of salmon.
Schindler: spawning productivity of rivers changes over time -- me: so shouldn't we protect *all* rivers?
Schindler: Are doomsday scenarios the best way to get the message out to the public?
By the time this conference is over we'll have eaten all the fish in the sea.
Q&A - Hokkaido also has conflicts between agriculture and fisheries.
Q&A - salmon can quickly repopulate territory if habitat is cleaned up and access enabled.
Q&A - unfortunately, education on salmon preservation is weak.
Q&A - if policymakers would err on the side of safety, we'd have better monitoring.
Q&A - Japan considers 2nd-gen hatchery spawners to be "wild" as long as from same stock.
Walton: need to look at viability of salmon at local levels -- creeks.
Walton: hatchery reform will be crucial to the survival of wild salmon.
Walton: over-harvest and hatcheries impact wild fish.
Walton: if you want to keep salmon runs strong, don't ruin your rivers.
Walton: after a century of using salmon hatcheries, we still don't know if they benefit salmon.
Walton: challenge is to develop a concise story we can tell people about protecting wild salmon.
Walton: How are we going to change human behaviour in relation to wild salmon?
Walton: do we have a common vision for a wild salmon policy?
Walton: endangered salmon are a West Coast-wide issue.
Walton: we have been working on recovery plans for a long time, but need people's support.
Last US administration (Bush) gave little support to conservation.
Bowles: fish only care about action -- what are we doing to fix things?
Bowles: "plan" has become a four-letter word, but plans are essential for salmon recovery.
Bowles: hatchery fish are not a replacement for natural populations.
Bowles: key threat to salmon is apathy.
Bowles: public becoming more disconnected from fish and their watersheds.
Riddell: conservation of wild salmon and their habitat is the highest priority.
Riddell: in BC/Yukon there are 8300 combinations of streams/salmon species.
Riddell: diversity is key to preserving salmon.
White: all groups that harvest salmon have a sense of entitlement.
Kulikov: sounds like Russia also has jurisdictional and bureaucratic issues.
Kulikov: First protected area in Khabarovsk area was created in 1920s.
Nagata: Japan looking at zone management for coexistence of hatchery and wild salmon.
Nagata: Commercial and game fisheries in rivers are prohibited in Hokkaido.
Nagata: Hokkaido fishery needs to change to wild salmon management objectives.
Nagata: calls native salmon spawning "traditional management", hatcheries "modern management".
Nagata: Hatcheries in Japan were established in 1888 from US.
Rawson: Pogo - we have met the enemy and he is us.
Rawson: we can't be doing things the same way that we have been doing them.
Rawson: habitat protection is the key contributor to saving the salmon.
Rawson: there is little public confidence in process for protecting habitat.
Rawson: Spawner return in some Puget Sound rivers is less than 10% of historic figures.
Rawson: lost 75-90 % of estuary habitat in Puget Sound.
Rawson: Habitat loss is the key factor for decline of Puget Sound chinook salmon.
Rawson: Hatchery risks - genetic, ecological, disease, etc.
Rawson:hatcheries are our arrogant assumption that we can do better than Mother Nature.
Rawson: causes of chinook decline - harvest, hatcheries and habitat.
Rawson: Skagit chinook have declined dramatically over last 50 yrs.
Rawson: Puget Sound chinook listed as threatened.
Quinn: larger fish may enter spawning grounds ealier than small fish.
Quinn: in some cases, middle of run is fished hard, with early and late less exploited.
Quinn: so we might be hitting more "early" fish, and more "late" fish.
Quinn: human exploitation appears to affect timing of spawning runs to some degree.
Quinn: fishing rates (exploitation) vary widely during run timing due to management.
Quinn: fisheries are less size-selective than they used to be.
Quinn: intermediate sizes of fish are most vulnerable to being caught.
Quinn: expected that gillnet fishery is selective against large fish.
Quinn: salmon have been declining in body size -- selective effects of fishing?
Quinn: humans have an impact on evolution of animals through hunting.
Quinn: humans have a long history of affecting the evolution of animals.
First nations comment - science must work with first nations knowledge.
Audience comment - global warming is a symptom of overpopulation.
Williams: Aldo Leopold - humans must change from conquerors of land to members of it.
Williams: to save salmon - land ethic, multiple scales and political boundaries, restoration economy.
Williams: hatcheries alone cannot solve problem of declining salmon, declining biodeversity.
Williams: artificial species restocking is not biologically viable without addressing causes of decline.
Williams: impacts - rising temps, reduced snowpack, variability in flows, fires.
Williams: Stressors - human pop growth, resource consumption, invasive species, climate change.
Williams: reconnect rives to their floodplains, do not channel them.
Williams: Protect remaining habitat, Reconnect to other areas, Restore urban waterways.
Williams: we must protect remaining habitat.
Williams: 29% of Pacific northwest salmon stocks are extinct
Williams: Laws and regulations are not enough. We are destroying Earth -- ecological footprint.
How the heck do you "increase salmon resilience to climate change"? Isn't that evolution?
Vancouver Sun: Canadian fisheries management a mess.
Here are my Tweets from today's State of the Salmon 2009 conference sessions, in last-to-first order:
Fedorenko: Pacific Rim nations release 5 billion hatchery salmon/year.
Fedorenko: Total value of Pacific Rim commercial salmon catch $1 billion/year.
Beechie: Dams are the big story in extirpation of salmon in US lower 48, along with development.
Irvine: 50% or more of all BC salmon species are red/amber status (ie not good) in conservation units.
Irvine: In Canada general catch declines for all salmon species, 2008 one of lowest years.
Disappointed that reports from different countries are measuring different things so can't compare.
Hilsinger: Alaska salmon catches for all species have been good in last thirty years.
Radchenko: Russia releasing over half a billion hatchery salmon into Pacific annually.
Radchenko: Russian sockeye and chum catches are way up in the last ten years.
Kang: Korean salmon returns in 2000s fell to a third of returns in 1990s -- also warming?
Nagata: Focus on biodiversity of wild salmon and restoration of freshwater environments.
Nagata: Japan chum returns have fallen dramatically in south, more stable in north (Hokkaido) - warming?
Nagata: Japan stocking hundreds of millions of chum and pink fry.
Vladimir Belyaev: Important to improve national and international reporting to set reserves for salmon.
Vladimir Belyaev: Protecting entire watersheds is crucial to protecting salmon.
Vladimir Belyaev: Ocean survivability is moot if we don't protect spawning habitat -- rivers, estuaries.
Vladimir Belyaev: Russia is looking at setting up protected areas for salmon.
David Anderson: Concerned that Canada will fall behind US under Obama on climate change.
David Anderson: Major uncertainties about the impact of hatchery fish on ocean survival of wild stocks.
David Anderson: Strong opposition to change. People understand existing systems and fear the unknown.
David Anderson: The dead hand of the past protects the status quo.
Nathan Mantua: Humans are the primary drivers of change in salmon ecosystems.
Looking at Ecology and Society journal website: http://www.ecologyandsociety
Resilience Alliance http://www.resalliance.org/
David Suzuki -- World Scientists' Warning to Humanity, back in 1992 - http://deoxy.org/sciwarn.htm.
Suzuki: State of Salmon -- we invented the economy, we gotta change it.
Suzuki: State of Salmon -- all that humans can do is manage themselves, not other animals.
Suzuki: The most important lesson we have is the extent of our ignorance.
Suzuki: The future of salmon is bleak as long as politics and economics are the major drivers.
Guido Rahr fate of salmon will be determined in our lifetimes.
First Nations start by pointing out that side channels and creeks in the lower mainland are being destroyed.
I've heard David Suzuki refer to this document in several speeches, and he just did it again at the State of the Salmon 2009 conference, so I decided to look it up.
"Some 1,700 of the world's leading scientists, including the majority of Nobel laureates in the sciences, issued this appeal in November 1992. The Warning was written and spearheaded by UCS Chair Henry Kendall.
"Human beings and the natural world are on a collision course. Human activities inflict harsh and often irreversible damage on the environment and on critical resources. If not checked, many of our current practices put at serious risk the future that we wish for human society and the plant and animal kingdoms, and may so alter the living world that it will be unable to sustain life in the manner that we know. Fundamental changes are urgent if we are to avoid the collision our present course will bring about."
In an article in The Economist's The World in 2009 annual forecast, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, chairman of Nestle, says:
"I am convinced that, under present conditions and with the way water is being managed, we will run out of water long before we run out of fuel."
The reasoning being that it takes thousands of litres of water to grow enough food for one person per day. Yes, that's for one person's daily diet in an industrialized nation of meat eaters. Or how about several thousands of litres of water to grow enough plant matter to produce one litre of biofuel?
CBC has run a story on invasive plants in BC. It's about time the mass media began covering this issue. Streamkeepers and other groups have been putting in thousands of collective volunteer hours battling these non-native plants that overpower and kill native species, leading to monocultures that destroy habitat.
The ACT (Adaptation to Climate Change Team) at Simon Fraser U has released a couple of papers that may be of interest to people in BC.
White Paper on Climate Change Planning for BC
and
Climate Adaptation and Biodiversity: An Ecological and Community Perspective
I've been appointed to the City of Burnaby's Environment Committee as a citizen representative. Went to my first meeting last night, and was pleased to see several familiar faces among senior staff that I've worked with through my streamkeeping volunteering with the Byrne Creek Streamkeepers and the Edmonds Business and Community Association. I look forward to learning the ropes and contributing toward making Burnaby a great place to live, work and play.
According to this article, "WASHINGTON (Reuters) Hunting and gathering has a profound impact on animals and plants, driving an evolutionary process that makes them become smaller and reproduce earlier, U.S. researchers reported on Monday."
"Their study of hunting, fishing and collecting of 29 different species shows that under human pressure, creatures on average become 20 percent smaller and their reproductive age advances by 25 percent."
Over-harvesting of fish (and other species) results not only in reduced numbers, but smaller survivors....
If you think about this, it appears obvious -- think of trophy hunting -- we're constantly culling the biggest animals.
What does this say about the long-term sustainability of species that we "harvest"?
The Canadian Wildlife Federation has a good series of short videos on water. Check them out!
According to this Globe and Mail article, a new study shows that Canada's Department of Fisheries and Oceans is not monitoring enough salmon spawning streams to preserve salmon stocks.
Stocks may be even more depressed than previously feared, and without adequate monitoring, Pacific salmon could go down the road toward oblivion as have the Atlantic cod. It also appears that the DFO has a pattern of dropping monitoring of streams that are in trouble, potentially skewing results.
Interesting article on a joint project between Stanford University's Woods Institute for the Environment, the Nature Conservancy, and the World Wildlife Fund to develop software to assist in mapping the economic benefits of marine ecosystems.
I like the following quotation:
"'People tend to look at nature in one of two ways,' added Michael Wright, managing director of the Natural Capital Project. 'We either ignore the values it provides altogether, or we focus only on one specific commercial value, such as fisheries,' he said. 'We see individual pieces, not the whole. As a result, the collective value of nature is diminished. Through this grant we want to develop tools that do not just maximize the fisheries but capture all of the interests that depend on the oceans.'"
Any effort to broaden the way we calculate the "value" of nature is to be applauded.
The Newshour with Jim Lehrer on PBS had a good video on stormwater management in the northwest US.
It presents the problems with urban runoff and what can be done about it.
What I find interesting is that often Canadians feel that they are miles ahead of Americans when it comes to the environment, when in fact US legislation and *enforcement* put us to shame.
According to this article, increases in population and climate change are putting even greater pressure on the Colorado River, leading to potentially worse water shortages in the future.
What I found interesting is that there is no mention of fish or other wildlife in the article. Makes you wonder if any species other than humans have been written off already...
The history of our exploitation of water in the west is long and torturous. I recommend the meticulously researched and well-written Cadillac Desert by Marc Reisner on this topic.
"All of BC has a stake in better managing once massive salmon runs. Third in a series."
Part of the Exploring the Fate of the Fraser River series in The Tyee.
'Crisis puts climate fight back on the back burner'
'Public is tiring of climate change fight, poll finds'
The above two headlines ran together on the same page in today's Vancouver Sun.
To some extent I understand the apathy and amnesia about what is happening to the environment as the global financial and economic crisis hits home. What I don't get is why the old economy always seems to trump the environment. Without clean air and water, without productive land, we cannot survive. We are talking about our health and well-being, not only that of some nebulous "environment".
Let's take a look at a few more headlines from the last week:
'Complete fishing halt won't save cod: study' -- in today's National Post. Do you like fish and chips? How about 'Gulf cod are doomed, DFO finds' -- the same story in the Sun.
'Aquatic food webs at risk' -- on the same page as the two headlines that started this blog post.
Yesterday's Sun -- 'Abbotsford mushroom farms fined for dumping toxins: Waste caused destruction of salmon-bearing stream'
Well knock me down with a feather! It took nearly two years, but enforcement and fines actually happened. What about the guy who was caught wet-booted pouring chemicals into John Mathews Creek in the watershed that I live in? How many more years will we wait for action on that blatant poisoning?
'Boy died from spraying too much deodorant: Solvent in can most probably cause of death, coroner finds' -- Vancouver Sun, Nov. 21.
So you think all those cleansers and beauty products in your house, and pesticides in your garage, are fine because they are "approved", eh? Think again...
'Declining gas prices could derail surge in transit use' -- Vancouver Sun, Nov. 21.
'Way cleared for farmed fish to be labeled as organic' -- Vancouver Sun, Nov. 21. And what about all those chemicals used in the process?
'Scientists assail easing of rules for natural gas exploration: Planned changes cited as path to ecological crisis in boreal forests' -- Vancouver Sun, Nov. 21.
I've got more articles cut out of the paper in the last week or two, but I think the trend is clear. So why don't we get it? Are we so self-absorbed and selfish that we'll just continue to consume and spray and clear cut and mindlessly "develop" and the hell with our own health and the prospects for our children and their children?
Coho are dying in restored streams in Seattle before they can spawn, according to this Seattle Post-Intelligencer article. The cause is speculated to be polluted runoff from roads. We have noted the same effect here in the lower mainland of British Columbia, with many coho dying unspawned in "our" stream, Byrne Creek in southeast Burnaby. While Byrne has received few coho in the last few years, it's even more tragic when the few that do come back do not spawn before they die.
According to the Seattle article, coho in rural creeks are fine, it's urban creeks and restored city waterways in which the fish are struggling -- precisely the creeks that suffer most from pollutants.
Thanks to streamkeeper Joan for pointing out the article.
Byrne Creek Streamkeepers were interviewed by CBC radio reporter Terry Donnelly today. Joan Carne and I spoke about the trials and tribulations facing urban creeks, and the positive news that this year's run of chum and coho spawners in Byrne Creek had at least matched the new low set last year. Why is that good news? Well, it's the first time in several years that the numbers had not declined!
We covered some of the issues affecting urban creeks including scouring and erosion caused by massive runoff during rains due to the buildup of impervious surfaces (roads, parking lots, roofs) in urban watersheds, pollution from road wash that goes down storm drains including gas, oil, antifreeze, brake dust, rubber dust, etc. Terry was also curious about efforts to daylight creeks, or bring them back to life from the pipes that they have been buried in.
It was a great conversation, and I hope a decent portion makes it onto the air. I know that the vagaries and time pressures of journalism often result in at best a minute or two of a two-hour discussion actually being published...
The piece should air on B.C. Almanac on Friday, Nov. 28, 2008, and the latest we heard was that it was slated for 1:40 p.m.
You can monitor the show here.
(http://www.cbc.ca/bcalmanac/) Just look for the link near the top of the page under "Listen Live".
Byrne Creek Streamkeepers had a booth up at Rivers Day on the BCIT campus in Burnaby today. It was a gorgeous day with lots to see and do.

Hanging a temporary Stream of Dreams mural for the event.

Byrne Creek display.

Rivers Day founder Mark Angelo and BC Environment Minister Barry Penner.

VIPs release cutthroat trout into Guichon Creek.

A curious ball of fluff watches the activities.
I had the pleasure of taking MP Peter Julian and BC MLA Raj Chouhan on a tour of the upper Byrne Creek watershed this afternoon. I appreciate the time these gentlemen took to listen to streamkeepers' concerns, learn about efforts to enhance the watershed, and view a couple of proposed project sites.
Peter and Raj have toured Byrne Creek ravine and the artificial spawning habitat previously, but this time we concentrated on the "creek beneath the streets" -- the upper part of Byrne Creek that has long been buried and piped into the storm drain system. I took the opportunity to talk about the possibility of daylighting (bringing the creek back up from pipes) in Ernie Winch Park, and creating a rain garden/biofiltration facility at the lower end of Southpoint Dr.
Thanks again, Peter and Raj!
I ran across a SEA (street edge alternative) street in White Rock today, but on taking a closer look, it appeared to be more of an alternative sidewalk. SEA streets do away with curbs and gutters, and replace them with vegetated swales to reduce the impact of rain into storm drain systems and filter out pollution. This street had small swales but it still had a curb... Hmm... There were openings cut into the curb here and there, with small guides to let street runoff in, but I don't think they would accomplish much.


As you can see, the regular storm drain is still in place, and the teeny street diversion would not move much water into the swale.
I'm not an engineer, and I'm scratching my head on this one :-). Most such projects attempt to capture the polluted water from streets... Not nearly as much pollution on the sidewalks...
Having a car wash fundraiser? Make sure you're not polluting your local creek while you're at it -- all street drains lead directly to local waterways with no treatment. So what's the solution? A salmon-friendly car wash kit. I picked this up from the Pacific Streamkeepers Federation bulletin board and think it's a great idea.
Check out this info on the kits from our neighbours to the south in King County, Washington.
It would be great if the City of Burnaby would get a few of these kits and make them available at community centres!
People on a mailing list were discussing the damage humans do to the environment, and the "damage" that Mother Nature does. Here was my two cents:
I suppose it depends on one's definition of "damage." A lot of what Mother Nature does could also be called "renewal" or "ecosystem change or development" or.... Nature is not static by nature :-).
The kind of damage that humans do is very different from the kind of damage that Mother Nature does. Our damage tends to be more permanent. Once we've changed something, we are loath to see nature reclaim or reuse it in any shape, manner or form.
As a streamkeeper, I like to use the example of rivers. In their natural, healthy state, rivers are alive. They shift, they move, they're full of snags that provide habitat, they carry and turn over gravel that fish need to spawn in. They are constantly changing. They flood, and floods are good because the silt and accompanying biota renew the land.
Then people come along and choose to build in the flood plain. Now suddenly for one species -- us -- the annual flooding isn't all that pleasant, so then comes the channeling, the diking, the building of dams. Those snags and other woody debris are dangerous for boaters, so they're pulled out. The river is dredged to provide safe passage. The spawning gravel is mined for more construction. The river is a shackled shadow of its former self.
In addition, we choose to take our bodily and manufacturing wastes and pipe them into rivers, often with little or no treatment.
And the irony is that it is we who make rivers "dangerous" through all of our construction. The forests are gone, the meadows are gone, the wetlands are gone, so when it rains the water has nowhere to go but into the storm-drain system and then directly into the river, instead of soaking into the ground. And all that diking and channeling ends up just collecting all the force that would have dissipated in a natural flood plain. So when the levee breaks and we suffer damage.... whose fault is it? Can we blame Mother Nature?
In this age of burgeoning fuel prices, water shortages, and rampant over-consumption, how about offering environmentally state-of-the-art show homes as prizes in hospital and other charity lotteries?
I'd much prefer a technological masterpiece, a well-crafted jewel, instead of the bloated, rambling, poorly finished, overdecorated monster houses that are par for the course for charity lotteries in the lower mainland of British Columbia.
I challenge these charities to take up the sustainability challenge!
Compete on the following features:
- Enviro-certified lumber and wood products
- Low/No-emission paint and carpets
- Low-flow water fixtures
- Dual-flush, low-flow toilets
- On-demand water heaters
- Passive solar water heating assist
- Supplemental active solar electricity generation
- The best in wall insulation and thermal windows
- Rain barrels
- Moisture-sensing drip irrigation
- Landscaping with no lawns
- Landscaping with native plants
- Vegetable gardens
- And on and on, the possibilities are endless
Any takers?
I picked up a Lexmark Z816 colour inkjet printer today at a second-hand shop for $19 -- the box had never been opened. I didn't know much about the printer, but I figured I couldn't go wrong for $19.
When I got home and checked the Web, I discovered the Z816 had originally been priced at $79, had already been discontinued, and had received middling reviews, but I tried a few test pages of colour text and photos, and was pleased with the results.
Heck, for $19, when the ink that came with the printer runs out, I could toss the whole thing in the trash anyway. Not that my anti-consumerism conscience would allow me to do so, but it's rather frightening to think of how easy it would be to do just that. What with the price of inkjet cartridges, it makes more personal economic sense to buy another $19 printer!
There's something wrong with this picture... What a wasteful society we live in. One that does not calculate the true economic costs of producing and trashing stuff like Lexmark Z816s...
Today Adera Development Corp. handed a $7,500 cheque over to the Pacific Salmon Foundation that is designated for projects by the Byrne Creek Streamkeepers. Adera has already printed colour brochures for the Byrne Creek Streamkeepers, so the total donation is $10,000.
Thanks!

Photo by Cindy Sommerfield
Adera has built several developments in the Byrne Creek watershed, and wanted to give back to the community by supporting the efforts of the streamkeepers. Byrne Creek Streamkeepers plan to use the funds on stormwater management facilities such as rain gardens and biofiltration ponds that would naturally filter and slow flows into the creek, in conjunction with the City of Burnaby.
I got two pairs of sandals today (Coast Mountain Sports had a buy one pair get the second at 50% off sale), a pair of Keen Newport H2 Hybrids that are designed to get wet and should be perfect for canoeing, streamkeeping, and beach walking, and a pair of North Face Sea Wrath Convertibles for more mundane everyday use over the summer. One of my old sandals blew out the other day, beyond gluing repair...
(BTW who comes up with these names? I checked the "Sea Wrath" labels several times, and yes, they really say "Sea Wrath" whatever that means... Was it supposed to be "Sea Wraith" and something got lost between here and China? As for the Newport H2 Hybrids, well Newport has the flair of a famous port, but H2? H20 as in water? Tough as a Hummer H2? Hybrid as in eco-friendly? Hybrid as in land and sea?)
Anyway, I think I'll like both sets of shoes, but man, that "new car" smell! When I brought them home I put the boxes in my office and opened them up to show them to my wife. When I went back down to my office a few hours later, whew! A rubbery, chemical odour had pervaded the room. I immediately put them in the garage to air out.
What with the news the other day of the toxins released from plastic shower curtains, the odour from the new sandals appeared to be cause for concern. I have no idea if the smell is associated with harmful chemicals, but when something turns your stomach, it's a good bet it isn't friendly to your system.
I don't intend to finger these two companies in particular, as I'm sure their competitors use similar materials. I've heard both try to do their bit for the environment. I just wonder about that initial smell!
According to this CBC article, lakes across Canada are being classified as mining-tailings waste sites, using an obscure mining regulation to apparently trump the Fisheries Act that prohibits the dumping of toxins into any fish-bearing waters.
This is insane.
Both the government and the businesses involved must be confronted on this issue. The government for failing to protect the environment, wildlife, and everyone's health, and businesses for proposing this idiocy. I run my own business, belong to my local board of trade, my neighbourhood business association, and this sort of cavalier destruction sickens me. These companies are getting a free ride with no real accounting of the associated environmental and health costs. Where does the death of a watershed touch the profit-loss statement or balance sheet?
Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Loyola Hearn should resign for failing his department's mandate to protect our watersheds and fish.
[Counterpoint, June 17] OK, I was riled and while I stand by my post, I should acknowledge that without the mining industry, I wouldn't even be able to have a blog :-). Think of all the metals in my computer... the coax cable that connects me to the Internet... the server farm that hosts my site... The electricity plants that make it all run. Not to mention the pervasive use of metals in all sorts of items I use daily. Would I give up my watch? My cameras? My shower?
Yet I do believe there is a huge disconnect between what we pay for products and what their true cost is. Some inputs into the raw-materials production and manufacturing processes are not accounted for, and neither are most unacknowledged outputs such as garbage and toxins.
Choices in the Park hosted a salmon BBQ for Earth Day, and once again Byrne Creek Streamkeepers had our booth set up for the event. We also did two tours of the creek for people interested in getting out in nature and learning a bit about what streamkeepers do.
Thanks again to Choices for having donations from the BBQ this weekend and last weekend going to help efforts to keep Byrne Creek clean and habitable for all the fish and wildlife that it supports.
We presented two hand-cut, hand-painted cedar salmon to Choices CEO Mark Vickars and Choices in the Park manager Dominic Uy in appreciation of their efforts.

Me, Dominic and Mark

Pointing out park features on creek tour.
The Fraser Valley Hatchery was the site of the premier screening of Peter Donaldson's Eagle Eye, a video based on his one-man show "of ecological intrigue about the ancient dance of interdependence between Salmon and Eagle, creating a classic teaching legend."
Donaldson is a breathtaking writer and performer, known for his Salmonpeople masterpiece. Tonight's event, hosted by the Freshwater Fisheries Society of B.C., was a "beta" run of the video, with Donaldson seeking input from the audience as to what parts really engaged people, what sections lost their interest, and how the project could be disseminated and used in secondary schools, colleges, universities and communities for environmental education dealing with biodiversity and systems thinking.
Donaldson's show was filmed during the Fraser Valley Bald Eagle Festival, and is an emotionally powerful performance that really gets you thinking about life and our interdependence with other species and nature.
In the afternoon I represented the Byrne Creek Streamkeepers at a climate change workshop at Byrne Creek Secondary in southeast Burnaby. The Check Your Head group (Educating Youth for Global Hope and Local Action) facilitated the event, and I provided background on streamkeeping and how kids could volunteer on creek activities. I love working with students and getting their perspective on these sorts of issues.


Our 3D relief map of the Byrne Creek watershed was a big hit.
This morning I represented the Stream of Dreams Murals Society at a recognition breakfast thanking people and organizations involved in Learning Exchange Programs run by the University of British Columbia. The event was held at the beautiful First Nations Longhouse on campus, and Dr. Richard Verdan provided a moving, inspirational, and humorous welcoming greeting, while explaining and sharing the cultural significance of the venue. Professor Stephen J. Toope, the UBC President and Vice Chancellor, hosted the event and gave an excellent speech thanking all those involved in the program.
SDMS hosted a group of UBC student volunteers as part of the program this year. I wasn't involved in the day-to-day activities, but as president of the SDMS board of directors, I dropped by a couple of times and listened, learned and shared with the students. I was impressed with the diversity of backgrounds, and by the interest the students showed in the SDMS environmental education and community art program.
"We want our park, we want our wild salmon, and we want you to go away," said Burke Mountain Naturalists activist Elaine Golds, to rousing cheers from the crowd at a forum on multiple run-of-river power projects planned for several streams on the upper Pitt River.
The overflow crowd jammed into the much-too-small venue was spirited and angry, with cat calls often interrupting presentations by the BC Environmental Assessment Office, BC Parks, and the proponent, Run of River Power Inc.
Although I strongly oppose the projects and the accompanying proposal to cut a power transmission right of way through Pinecone Burke Provincial Park, I was dismayed at the uncivil attitude dominating the crowd.
Yet people had reason to be frustrated. Pinecone Burke is a pristine Class A park that people fought for many years to be declared off limits to logging, mining and hydro projects. To ask that the boundary be adjusted now is crazy.
To invade all the salmon-bearing streams in the upper Pitt is crazy.
To pay private producers 5 or more times the rate for power than the province produces is crazy.
Eventually the fire marshal showed up, and said the number of people in the room had to be reduced. At that point, several hotter heads began shouting "We won't leave!" OK, act like children having a tantrum in the face of logic and safety -- I thought it best to slip away.
As I was wriggling myself out of the room, people were demanding that the meeting be rescheduled in a larger venue. I'm all for that. And while I admire the passion, I think some of the behavior tonight was counterproductive. The mandarins in the room have to follow this provincial government's restrictive policies -- it's the politicians noted for their absence who should bear the brunt.
As the cry went up: "Where are you Environment Minister Penner?"
The Nooksack Dace is a little fish found only in a few rivers and streams in the Lower Mainland of BC. It has been listed as endangered under the Species at Risk Act, and tonight I attended a Department of Fisheries and Oceans forum on steps being taken to identify and protect crucial habitat. It was an interesting presentation on the dace and its preferred habitat. Unfortunately, the ratio of audience to DFO staff was about 10:6 -- it could have been better publicized.
Something that I found interesting was that all remaining Nooksack Dace habitat is in developed/developing areas. That's going to make it really tough to preserve this species. I asked if in the future there would be attempts to transplant dace to other streams in their previous range. They're not at that point yet, but one of the biologists said that transplanting would certainly contribute to keeping the species from going extinct.
Here is the recovery strategy for the fish, and watch the SARA public registry for a 60-day comment period after the strategy is officially posted soon.
There's a lot of talk about "green power" in British Columbia, but are initiatives like privately developed "run of river" power projects really green? Few citizens seem to be aware that companies have applied for such projects on streams throughout the province -- and that they are using our water for free while selling their power to BC Hydro at higher rates than the public utility charges.
Run-of-river is being spun as green, but it looks more like death by a thousand cuts.
Problems with these projects include the amount of water diverted (up to 80%!), the roads built to get access to streams to build the plants, the swaths cut through forests for power lines.... It goes on and on. Companies are already trying to get land removed from parks for their construction.
I urge people to check out the video series "Power Play: The Theft of BC's Rivers" at the Save Our Rivers Society website.
Thanks to the Pacific Streamkeepers Federation for making me aware of these videos.
The mystery "porridge" has fouled Byrne Creek yet again. We know it comes down the Hedley St. storm drain and into the creek, but the City of Burnaby's engineering department has not managed to confirm the source yet. This has been going on for months now in a haphazard manner. Hope they track it this time!

The stuff was pooled all along the creek. While it does not appear to be toxic, it has no business coming down storm drains into the creek.
UPDATE on Feb. 15: City staff have found the source and are dealing with it. While for legal reasons they can't tell us the details, streamkeepers are relieved that this ongoing irritant will be under control. Thank you!
I don't like ratting people out, and I won't specifically finger anyone today, even though the Year of the Rat is now officially underway :-).
All I will say is that on my walk today I ran across a City of Burnaby truck with two gentlemen sleeping inside with the motor running. While the City does not seem to have an anti-idling bylaw, it does have a DriveSmart educational program that includes city staff. One of the main initiatives of the program is to reduce idling. I guess the guys in the truck missed the message... They could have been on a legitimate break, but the optics certainly didn't look good. And I've seen this sort of thing several times all over the city.
I think it's important for the City to set a good example, and workers like the ones I saw today ain't it. Not only were they polluting, they were burning my tax dollars for no useful purpose.
We replaced the crappy (no pun intended) Cranada toilet in our downstairs bathroom with an American Standard Flo-Wise dual-flush unit today. The Cranada had never, uh, done its business very well, often requiring two flushes of its outdated and wasteful 13.25-liter tank.
In contrast, the FloWise offers a choice of a 3-liter flush or a 6-liter flush.
Of course nothing went as smoothly as it should have. To begin with, we went to Home Depot to buy an American Standard regular flush 6-liter model that we'd looked at previously, only to discover they had the dual-flush units in stock. The question was, how much did they cost? The bowls were $93.60, but we couldn't see a price for the tank. A staff member came along, and told us the tanks were $137, pointing to a tank that obviously was not a dual-flush unit. We had a little debate about model numbers, etc., but he kept insisting he was right. OK, we took a bowl and a dual-flush tank to the checkout expecting an exorbitant price for the tank, and it was only $96.38! (BTW, the bowl included a seat and lid, something that not all models do). The dual-flush was actually about $80 cheaper than the 6-liter single flush.
Happy with our savings, we headed off home, removed the old toilet and began installing the new one. When we opened the tank box, we discovered the tank cover was badly chipped. OK, back to Home Depot, where they readily refunded the first tank and sold us a second one. As soon as we were out the door, out came my trusty Swiss Army knife, and we checked the second unit. It was OK.
We are pleased with the appearance, and especially the performance and water savings of the new unit.
Dual-flush toilets have been commonplace in Japan for at least 20 years, and I'm glad they're finally appearing in Canada. Another common feature in Japan that I have yet to see in Canada is the hand-washing tank recharge -- the water that refills the tank come out of a little spout on top of the tank, and the tank lid has a depression like a mini sink so that you can wash your hands with the water that is refilling it.
Just after I wrote a review of the Natural Step, I saw a link to Natural Step Canada on the Pacific Streamkeepers Federation mailing list.
The link was to the Sustainability at Home toolkit, which looks like an excellent resource. Check it out to see how you can contribute toward a more sustainable world with small steps at home.
The American Planning Association has an interesting Policy Guide on Planning for Sustainability that it has ratified. While I haven't read it entirely yet, it appears to follow "Natural Step" (see previous blog post) ideas for achieving sustainable communities. I wonder if Canadian planners have adopted a similar guide, and whether or not communities here are following it? As a volunteer at City of Burnaby stakeholder meetings, I wonder if the city aims to follow such guides in its community plans and ISMPs?
Here's a taste:
OBJECTIVES OF APA’S STRATEGY FOR PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABILITY
Planning for sustainability requires a systematic, integrated approach that brings together environmental, economic and social goals and actions directed toward the following four objectives:1. Reduce dependence upon fossil fuels, extracted underground metals and minerals.
Reason: Unchecked, increases of such substances in natural systems will eventually cause concentrations to reach limits as yet unknown at which irreversible changes for human health and the environment will occur and life as we know it may not be possible.
2. Reduce dependence on chemicals and other manufactured substances that can accumulate in Nature.
Reason: Same as before.
3. Reduce dependence on activities that harm life-sustaining ecosystems.
Reason: The health and prosperity of humans, communities, and the Earth depend upon the capacity of Nature and its ecosystems to reconcentrate and restructure wastes into new resources.
4. Meet the hierarchy of present and future human needs fairly and efficiently.
Reason: Fair and efficient use of resources in meeting human needs is necessary to achieve social stability and achieve cooperation for achieving the goals of the first three guiding policies.
I finished The Natural Step for Communities: How Cities and Towns can Change to Sustainable Practices by Sarah James and Torbjorn Lahti today. Amid all the doom and gloom about global warming and unsustainable ecological footprints, it's a hugely inspirational guide to changing how we plan and build our towns and cities.
Many of the case studies are taken from Sweden, where all levels of government -- municipal, regional and national -- appear to be light years ahead of what we are doing here in Canada.
The Natural Step proposes four simple guiding objectives (p. 9):
1. Eliminate our community's contribution to fossil fuel dependency and to wasteful use of scarce metals and minerals.2. Eliminate our community's contribution to dependence upon persistent chemicals and wasteful use of synthetic substances.
3. Eliminate our community's contribution to encroachment upon nature (e.g., land, water, wildlife, forests, soil, ecosystems).
4. Meet human needs fairly and efficiently.
The Natural Step should be required reading for politicians and bureaucrats everywhere, and should also be incorporated into school curricula.
The book also contains many examples of businesses that have used sustainability principles to become more profitable. "Billions of people around the world have problems with unsustainable development. What a market for those who have solutions!" (p. 221).
Solar and wind power are all the rage, yet I am banned from using them to dry my clothes. And no need to spend thousands on solar panels or windmills -- just a few bucks to run a clothesline. A what? A clothesline! Apparently it's cutting-edge technology -- yet it's been around for hundreds and thousands of years.
So what happened to clotheslines? For years, people managed to dry their clothes, bedding and towels using solar and wind power -- in other words, outdoors. I lived in Tokyo for 14 years and never had a clothes dryer. I lived in apartments and had a washer, but as with most Japanese in cramped quarters, I managed without a dryer. Japanese apartment balconies come equipped with staggered hooks on which you can hang poles to dry your laundry.
Tokyo and other Asian cities are festooned with drying clothes and bedding, yet my strata here in Burnaby, British Columbia, actually forbids drying clothes on balconies.
I wonder how much energy could be saved simply by drying clothes outside? Oh, you say it's too wet here? Well, Japan has a long, humid rainy season in the late spring/early summer, a typhoon season in the fall, and darn cold weather in the winter. Yet 110 million people there somehow manage to get by with very few of them having clothes dryers.
British Columbia should amend the Strata Act to ban stratas from banning balcony clothes drying.
Oil that had accumulated on Southpoint Dr. in southeast Burnaby was flowing down the rain drain at the bottom end of the cul-de-sac and into Byrne Creek this afternoon as a steady drizzle washed pollution off the street.

Can you imagine the cumulative flow of this crap into drains all over the city -- all of which lead to local creeks, rivers and the ocean? Yuck!
It is precisely for this reason that streamkeepers are pushing the city to build bio-filtration swales and ponds. There are well-known, well-established ways to ameliorate the impact of such pollution on fish and wildlife habitat.
Down-to-Earth Choices
Tips for making where you live one of Canada's Healthy Neighbourhoods.
A simple-to-use guide from Environment Canada offering hundreds of tips and suggestions on environmentally sensitive habits for individual Canadians to practise every day, everywhere. Our choices and our actions will determine the future of the environment. Let's choose to act wisely now and make the world a safer and healthier place to live in.
Thanks to the Pacific Streamkeepers Federation for posting this link.
Long before Brundtland, decades before the term "sustainability" was overused, abused and corrupted beyond recognition -- a great fisherman, naturalist, and writer said it all:
"It seems clear beyond the possibility of argument that any given generation of men can have only a lease, not ownership, of the earth; and one essential term of the lease is that the earth be handed on to the next generation with unimpaired potentialities."
Roderick Haig-Brown
BC Environment Minister Barry Penner saw a Stream of Dreams program in action at the Oaklands elementary school in Victoria today.
The Stream of Dreams Murals Society has reached over 60,000 school children to date, teaching them about their local watersheds and creating Dreamfish to install on school fences to remind communities about the importance of clean water and healthy ecosystems.
Yumi and have decided that we will not exchange Christmas gifts this year with each other, and other members of our families. Why not?
It has become increasingly difficult to find anything useful or meaningful to give. We have everything we need, and a garage full of stuff we're getting rid of by sorting and donating it to thrift stores run by the Burnaby Hospice Society and the Salvation Army.
I'm a well-indoctrinated consumer so certainly there is a ton of stuff that I want, but nothing I really need, and Yumi feels the same way.
We'll still do some fun, cheap stuff for the stockings, but no gifts.
I drove up to Kelowna this afternoon to attend the Building Sustainable Communities conference sponsored by the Fresh Outlook Foundation. I attended the conference last year and it was jam-packed with excellent speakers. This year's program looks very good as well, and I am looking forward to the kickoff tomorrow morning.
While driving up was probably not the carbon-friendliest means of transportation, I enjoyed the trip. The mountains were dusted with snow, but the roads were good for the most part except for the highest passes.

This morning the SalmonTrain was officially launched at Gilmore Station on the Skytrain Millennium Line. What's a SalmonTrain? It's a commuter train car covered with Stream of Dreams Murals Society (SDMS) Dreamfish, with an urban creek running down its floor with tips on maintaining healthy watersheds. Conceived by Louise Towell, a co-founder of SDMS, and implemented with the hard work of the Rivershed Society of BC and corporate partners Translink, 3M, and Lamar Advertising, the Stream of Dreams® SalmonTrain Mural in Motion is a vibrant means of educating the public about the importance of clean water in our creeks and streams.
As president of the charitable SDMS, I was proud and amazed at the results of nearly a year of hard work by all the partners. Here are some photos I took of the event, and the SalmonTrain.

The SalmonTrain poster at Gilmore Station.

Fin Donnelly, founder and executive director of RSBC, chairs the event.

Louise Towell, co-founder of SMDS, speaks.

Dan Johnson, Burnaby City councillor.

Partners pose in front of the Gilmore Station poster.

The SalmonTrain arriving at the station.

Louise and Joan Carne, SDMS co-founders.

The partners in front of the train.

A closer look at the exterior.

The urban stream inside the train.

An incredibly lifelike storm drain on the floor.

A closeup of Dreamfish in the floor stream.

The message? All street drains lead to fish habitat.

A ceiling poster, also called a "Michaelangelo."

Another ceiling poster.
So the message is, all rain drains (storm drains) connect directly to local creeks and streams. Why does this message need to get out? Ironically, as my wife Yumi and I walked home from Edmonds Skytrain Station after the event, we came across what was likely paint coming down Powerhouse Creek that leads to Byrne Creek. Somebody was washing out painting equipment into a storm drain, so we called the city in on it. There are still a lot of people to teach!

Update: Lots of stuff on You Tube
Salmon Train Launch -- Fin Donnelly, Louise Towell and Dan Johnson
Interviews:
I just ran across a site called wikiHow "The How-to Manual That You Can Edit."
It has several entries related to streamkeeping and stormwater management.
Here is an entry on creating a rain garden.
And another one on how to
reduce stormwater runoff at your home.
Looks like there are plenty of other goodies, too.
I was saddened to hear a report from Pamela Zevit of the Como Watershed Group that the creek was hit by toxins for the second time in a month, likely wiping out any remaining fish.
I am taking the liberty of posting her initial report here, which I found on the Salmonopolis website:
Second Toxic Event In A Month Wipes Out Remaining Como Creek FishBy Pam Zevit
It is with a heavy heart that I have to inform the community that a second toxic event has now impacted the remaining fish in Como Creek. Senior environmental emergency response, fire, the City and enforcement are all on scene at the time of this e-mail to deal with the problem and initiate the investigation. I have been on scene and have been provided some preliminary information. While there is some idea as to the cause of the event, the actual source of the toxic material which entered the creek system upstream of Millside school is still being determined via investigation. While I cannot provide any comment until such time as the information is made public, I can tell you that the last pocket of salmon and trout which were upstream of where the fire runoff entered the creek in July (just one month ago) are now dead. This basically means that while some remnant numbers of fish may have survived, for the most part the fish bearing part of the creek system from Brunette Avenue to at least the Superstore area (and possibly farther downstream) are now pretty much sterilized. Most of the dead fish will be collected as there are concerns that they may be toxic to wildlife.
If you wish further information please contact the City of Coquitlam in the coming days. I will pass on any further information when I know more.
I have toured the Como Watershed with Pamela and want to express my sympathies (and outrage) at these avoidable events. It is difficult to find the words to express the heartbreak and anger that accompany a tragedy like this, after one has invested so much time and effort into preserving a slice of nature in the concrete jungle. I wish Como Creek the best, and may nature work her wonders in bringing life back to its waters.
Whole fresh pink salmon (head off and gutted) were on sale today at Save On Foods at Highgate Mall in Burnaby for $2.99 each. Yes, I said "each." I was struck by what seemed to be the shockingly low price -- fishermen had to burn fuel and amortize boats and equipment to catch the fish, they had to be cleaned, and then shipped a fair distance.
The one I chose weighed in at 1.1 kg (I weighed it on a kitchen scale at home because the weights were not indicated on the packaging), or about 27 cents per 100 grams, less than the occasional sale price of 29 cents per 100 grams, and much less than the common price of 39 cents or more per 100 grams.
I wonder if our society is properly valuing this resource.
Addendum: I just discovered that Save On Foods is donating 50 cents from the sale of each salmon to the CKNW Orphans’ Fund. While I laud the gesture, it doesn't ameliorate my concern -- in fact it makes me really wonder how low the wholesale price of these fish is...
A professor in the School of Environment and Sustainability at Royal Roads University (where I'm studying) is conducting research on community liveability. If you have a few minutes, you can access the survey here.
Details:
I and my research team have embarked upon an ambitious research project to solicit feedback from two million Canadians exploring what kinds of relationships we have within our communities.
You can participate in this unique research in two ways:
1. Complete the online Community Liveability Survey. If you would like to enter the early bird draw (exclusive to members of the RRU community) as well as the general draw for one of five iPod Shuffles, simple enter your @community.royalroads.ca address into the space provided. Your response is CONFIDENTIAL. Your e-mail address will be used only for the random draws - you will not be contacted unless you win.
2. Encourage your family, friends and colleagues to complete the survey and share the survey link http://www.survey.crcresearch.org/index.php?sid=2 with the members of their many communities. To see how broad the reach is of our RRU community network, we ask all to type “peacock” in the last question of the survey, forwarding the same request on to their networks.
Ultimately we hope the findings will shed light on the relationships between agency (individual capacity), social capital and sustainable community development.
For further details on the project, including your opportunity to win an iPod Shuffle, please see the brief survey outline following my signature block. Thank you - your responses could well help shape the world we leave to our children and grandchildren.
~~~~~~~~~~
Ann Dale, Trudeau Fellow
Professor, School of Environment and Sustainability Faculty of Social
and Applied Sciences Canada Research Chair on Sustainable Community
Development Royal Roads University
2005 Sooke Road, Victoria, BC, V9B 5Y2
http://trudeaufoundation.ca http://www.e-researchagenda.ca
http://www.oursafetynet.org
*THE SURVEY*
Regardless of geographic location, our communities are formed by the individual day-to-day choices we all make. Many of our decisions to live more sustainably are shaped by the community resources available to us such as public transit, access to shops and restaurants, water and sewer, friends and family, health care, schools, services for seniors, and recreational opportunities. But do we define communities or do they define us?
In order to fully understand what makes a community sustainable and how it functions, Dr. Dale's research team is looking not only at the geographic communities in which we live, but also the relational communities of which we are members such as those related to our career, profession, sports and social interests, disabilities and illnesses, religion, age, gender, hobbies, sex, cultural background, and of course the virtual communities in which we find ourselves. They are also exploring what access to sustainable infrastructure a community has and how that determines how people come together.
Five randomly chosen respondents will be selected at the end of the survey period to win an iPod Shuffle. Your response is CONFIDENTIAL. You will only be asked to identify yourself if you wish to register to win the iPod Shuffle and you will not be contacted by anyone unless you win.
All results from the survey will be published online at www.crcresearch.org as of Sept 2008, with continual updates as numbers dictate.
"The survey is a dynamic research tool and thus, we will continue to collect data as long as there is community interest" says Dr. Dale. "We are hoping that this data allows us to learn more about gaps in community perspectives and critical linkages between agency, social capital and sustainable community development that will lead to concrete policy recommendations by governments."
Fin Donnelly, founder of the Rivershed Society of BC, gave a presentation on his work at the Fraser River Discovery Centre this evening. He recapped his amazing swims (twice!) down the entire length of the Fraser River, a distance of nearly 1,400 km, to highlight issues of sustainability. He also spoke about programs the Rivershed Society is working on including Project Rivershed which is focusing on the Brunette watershed in the Lower Mainland. Another exciting program from the Rivershed Society is the Sustainable Living Leadership Program, which takes young people on rafting trips down the entire length of the Fraser, while training them in leadership and sustainability along the way. Fin is also a councillor for the City of Coquitlam.
A River Runs Through Us is a Rivershed Society slogan highlighting the importance of healthy watersheds, and that we can all make a difference with our own behaviours.
Burnaby - New Westminster MP Peter Julian hosted a community forum on Building Environmentally Friendly Communities at Douglas College this evening. About 40-50 people showed up to hear Julian and four other speakers, followed by a question/answer/suggestion period. (Disclosure: Though Julian has appeared in several of my blog posts, I am not a member of any political party, and intend to maintain my independence in the future).
This is the first of three forums Julian is hosting on climate change. He said we need fundamental changes at all levels to tackle the issue, from individuals all the way up to the federal government.
The first speaker on the panel was Nicholas Lamm who works on the Green Workplace Program associated with the Environmental Youth Alliance. He spoke about creating green communities within businesses to make change last.
Scott Sinclair, VP of the BC Sustainable Energy Association, said BC is blessed with tremendous renewable energy resources. We could double the energy we now produce simply by tapping renewable resources such a wind, solar, geothermal, etc. He said his organization is working on a plan for a fossil-fuel free GVRD. The plan would cut CO2 emissions by 80% by 2025. The main way to achieve this would be by eliminating the use of natural gas for heating (replacing it with heat pumps, solar, wind, etc.) and the use of gasoline for transportation (replacing it with electricity). He said communities need to be redesigned for walking, cycling and transit.
Next came Tom Lancaster, Manager of Advisory Services, SmartGrowth BC. He pointed out that urban design is still centered on cars. He said at least 13 homes per acre are needed for a functional transit system, and on average we are nowhere near that density. We are still not building the right kinds of cities -- we need to create nodal town centers.
Last came Jonathan Cote, a New Westminster city councillor. He talked about a Green Action Plan that he and other young municipal councillors from all over BC are working on. He said a lot of mistakes have been made in designing the GVRD and that we continue to separate where we live from where we work, shop and play. We cannot be afraid of density. He said industrial land is important, and that New Westminster should ensure it remains industrial. He said it is critically important to engage the public. Last, he pointed out that municipalities are called upon to do more and more, but their revenue sources are limited to property tax for the most part.
Julian wrapped up the presentations by insisting that the Gateway Program that centers on twinning the Port Mann bridge is a bad decision. It basically rewards communities for adding to suburban sprawl and continues to focus transportation on cars.
The ensuing question/suggestion period came up with many suggestions for achieving greener communities. When an audience member complained about how many businesses and amenities New Westminster had lost or was losing -- a Canadian Tire, a Zellers, its only movie theater, a community theater, etc. -- meaning people would have to drive more, Cote pointed to neighbouring Burnaby's Big Bend big box developments (he also decried the Big Box-ification of his city's Queensborough area). As a Burnaby resident, I silently cheered, for Burnaby really screwed up on these developments that are completely car oriented and are sucking commerce out of the Kingsway corridor and the nearby Edmonds Town Centre -- undermining the city's own community plans.
David Suzuki spoke to an overflowing house today at Douglas College in New Westminster. After introductions from New Westminster Mayor Wayne Right and Councillor Jonathan Cote, Suzuki gave an impassioned speech that had the audience laughing, cheering and clapping.
His basic message? This is a moment when we as humans have to make some crucial decisions. We need to transform the way we live, and we have a very narrow window to do it in. We are the first and only species to actually change our planet, and we need to learn to control our impulses. There is good news out there, and it's up to each and every one of us to make our wishes for change known to our politicians. Though each of us alone may feel insignificant, when millions of us act together we can be a powerful force.
Suzuki urged audience members to sign up for his Nature Challenge and start contributing small, personal efforts toward sustainability.
Yumi and I did our bit today by taking the Skytrain down to the event, and then walking home, which took just over an hour :-).
Sustainability: Planning's Redemption or Curse?
Author: Michael Gunder, PhD
An excellent comment on how too often planners leave out the environmental and social equity components of sustainability in favor of the economy.
"Sustainability is often defined as a balance of the three E's: the environment, the economy, and social equity. But as planners embrace the concept, the sustainability 'balance' heavily favors one E: the economy. Michael Gunder warns that planners risk sacrificing the environment and social equity in the name of sustainable economic development."
This is the topic of my research project for my MA in Professional Communication from Royal Roads University.
At no time have people been more concerned about sustainability than they are now. We read and hear about environmental sustainability, corporate sustainability, sustainable development, and building sustainable communities. The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change published on October 30, 2006, forecast that human impact on climate change could result in damage to economic growth on the scale of the great wars and the economic depression in the last century. It was followed by stories based on an article in the journal Science projecting that global fish and other seafood stocks could completely collapse by 2048 if they continue to be lost at their present rate.
A recent Angus Reid poll called Canadians Question Government on Environment shows that 71% of Canadians do not think the federal government is doing enough on pollution and climate control, and in another Angus Reid poll, Environment Becomes Key Concern in Canada, 26% of Canadians say the environment is their top issue when it comes to the next national election, beating all other categories.
How are mass media framing sustainability? How does media coverage relate to the original concept of “sustainable development” proposed by a United Nations commission nearly 20 years ago? The World Commission on Environment and Development issued the Brundtland Report in 1987, saying “sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” Is there evident bias in how mass media report on sustainable development––in how the issue is framed? If there are biases in how mass media frame issues of sustainability, what are they?
In particular, how do the National Post and The Globe and Mail, which respectively are viewed as being Canada’s conservative and liberal national newspapers, frame sustainability and sustainable development? Do they cover the same stories? What are their biases, if any? How do they differ? How are they similar? What sources do they use? The underlying hypothesis of this research is that coverage and sources differ between the two newspapers, with the National Post slanted toward conservative stories highlighting business and economic impacts, and citing government and business sources, while the The Globe and Mail takes a more liberal stance, and cites more non-governmental organizations and environmentalists.
This research will shed light on the framing of sustainability in Canada’s national newspapers so that readers are aware of what is covered and how it is covered. The media play a huge role in setting agendas and framing the news, and citizens will benefit by becoming more discerning consumers of what they read.
I attended the Seeds for Change: Local Solutions to Global Issues conference at the University of British Columbia yesterday and today. It was organized by the UBC Student Environment Centre with support from the Sierra Youth Coalition.
While initially I felt somewhat out of place amidst a sea of young people, it was a fun and informative conference. Speakers ranged from Marx and Lenin-spouting whippersnappers to erudite professors with well thought-out presentations.
It's good to see that kids do care, and are thinking about the environment and sustainability.
I particularly enjoyed presentations by three well-spoken profs:
1) Yves Tiberghien on "The Global Battle over the Governance of Genetically Modified Food." He maintains an interesting site on the Politics of Genetically Modified Organisms.
2) Michael Byers, Professor, Canadian Research Chair in International Law and Politics, who spoke on "Climate Change -- Why Nothing is Happening at a Global Level." He gave an entertaining talk on why politicians and corporate leaders calculate that there is no reason to deal seriously with climate change.
3) Kai Chan, Assistant Professor at the Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, who spoke on "Conservation Planning of Ecosystem Services." The topic dealt with how ecosystem services (the benefits of nature that sustain and fulfill human life) are neglected and abused because they are not traded in markets and not accounted for in standard accounting practices.
The South Coast Conservation Program put on a one-day species-at-risk "Toward Solutions That Work" seminar in Burnaby today. There were a number of interesting speakers in the morning, followed by a planning exercise in the afternoon. I found it to be a very useful session, with a broad range of participants from municipal governments, the provincial and federal levels, and NGOs.
The planning exercise was eye-opening. Each table was given an air photo of an area that had three creeks running through it and extensive forested areas, with some development encroachment. Our task was to design in development for several thousand residents and some commercial facilities, while providing for several species at risk that depended on the existing ecosystem.
Needless to say we all came up with wonderful plans, only to see what really happened. The air photo had been taken in 1948 of an area in Coquitlam that was eventually 98% paved over and developed. Very sad.
The heartening aspect was that at least we discuss preserving urban biodiversity these days. Sustainability was not even on the table 30 or 40 years ago.
Ran across the worldchanging.com website tonight. It appears to be an excellent sustainability resource, and I think I'll buy the book, too. Everything from sustainable food to green building to smart growth to ecological economics to....
The second day of the 2006 State of the Fraser Basin Conference put on by the Fraser Basin Council was as interesting and even more inspiring than yesterday.
The exercise on interactive voting on actions from yesterday's breakout sessions was very informative and there was good audience interaction. There were also several more excellent speakers including Shawn Atleo, BC Regional Chief, Assembly of First Nations, and Canadian Olympic medalist Silken Laumann.
It's hard not to feel inspired when listening to speakers like Atleo and Laumann -- they really get across the principle that individual efforts can make a huge difference.
I'm looking forward to the next conference in January 2007.
I am attending the 2006 State of the Fraser Basin Conference put on by the Fraser Basin Council at the convention center in Vancouver today and tomorrow. The sessions today were a mix of depressing and inspiring. The focus of the conference is sustainability, and how governments, businesses, First Nations, and NGOs in the basin can work toward a sustainable future.
The council released its 2006 state of the basin snapshot (which can be downloaded from the above website), and overall, the grade was C-. Ouch. There is much we need to do.
I will share just a few highlights from each day that caught my interest.
First, the basin is projected to see 37% population growth over the next 25 years.
FBC Chair Dr. Charles Jago:
This conference is about inspiring action. We need collaboration for positive change. Realize synergies. We need to focus on what is most crucial. We have the ability to significantly remake our world. It is individuals who must act to change institutions. In turn institutions can change how individuals act.
James Hoggan, James Hoggan and Associates Inc.
Communicating Sustainability: People seem to be talking to themselves. People become less able to connect with broader perspectives. Gap between sustainability community and the general public. Need to bridge this gap to move forward to change how we function as a society. Research into how Canadians are thinking about sustainability.
Bad news – the word sustainability gets in the way. Very high level of mistrust of government, mistrust of business, mistrust of other Canadians, yet Canadians underestimate each others’ concerns about sustainability.
Canadians are very quick to understand sustainability and their values are in line with it, but they are looking for trustworthy leadership and are not seeing it.
Once the concept is explained to them, 82% of Canadians see sustainability as a top goal. Research shows 84% agree we need stricter laws and regulations to protect the environment and 65% agree businesses would be more profitable in the long run if they adhered to sustainability principles. Only 5% said they were not concerned about sustainability, yet thought 50% of other Canadians were not concerned!
How Canadians view sustainability:
Atheists (completely reject the concept) 2%
Heathen (oblivious to the concept) 16%
The Choir (sold on sustainability) 15%
The Congregation (receptive to sustainability) 67%
The Congregation is crucial because these people are enthusiastic but unfamiliar with the issues and too much negativity demoralizes them.
We must reach out on sustainability: Focus on the congregation. Second, given the degree of mistrust, we must communicate through action. Third, we need to define the term sustainability and use a human voice, use their language. The story needs to be hopeful, the benefits must be brought to the fore, and people must know they are not alone.
Canadians do not believe there is anyone at the wheel and are calling for leadership, particularly in sustainability.
The conclusion was that there is hope!
Chris Kelly Vancouver School Board:
There is more than a message here, there is an imperative that needs to be addressed. Humans are always intervening with cycles. The world is elegant and fragile at the same time. There are three themes in the snapshot report. A call for education/a call for learning. A call for leadership. A call for hope.
Young Canadians are starving for meaningful engagement. I’m not talking about learning instead of doing, but learning as active participation. There is no uniform way people learn. Learning is an individual and social process. Extend this to every organization. Importance of engaged learning with systems. Action is common learning. This is a time when a current generation must not pass on its way of doing things to a new generation. Leadership is the act of taking responsibility for the quality of other people’s experience.
Hope is the essential notion. Hope is the oxygen of the human spirit.
Kelly was an excellent speaker!
Paul Kariya, Pacific Salmon Foundation
If we’re going to have creativity we have to have fun. Think Salmon.
We, humankind are the problem, but we are also the solution.
------------------
Sorry for the jumble, and apologies to speakers that I left out!